The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experience- and Age-Related Outgrowth of Intrinsic Neurons in the Mushroom Bodies of the Adult Worker Honeybee
Abstract
A worker honeybee performs tasks within the hive for approximately the first 3 weeks of adult life. After this time, it becomes a forager, flying repeatedly to collect food outside of the hive for the remainder of its 5-6 week life. Previous studies have shown that foragers have an increased volume of neuropil associated with the mushroom bodies, a brain region involved in learning, memory, and sensory integration. We report here that growth of the mushroom body neuropil in adult bees occurs throughout adult life and continues after bees begin to forage. Studies using Golgi impregnation asked whether the growth of the collar region of the mushroom body neuropil was a result of growth of the dendritic processes of the mushroom body intrinsic neurons, the Kenyon cells. Branching and length of dendrites in the collar region of the calyces were strongly correlated with worker age, but when age-matched bees were directly compared, those with foraging experience had longer, more branched dendrites than bees that had foraged less or not at all. The density of Kenyon cell dendritic spines remained constant regardless of age or behavioral state. Older and more experienced foragers therefore have a greater total number of dendritic spines in the mushroom body neuropil. Our findings indicate that, under natural conditions, the cytoarchitectural complexity of neurons in the mushroom bodies of adult honeybees increases as a function of increasing age, but that foraging experience promotes additional dendritic branching and growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Developmental processes thus triggered by bGRNs may result in NN rewiring and growth (69) or changes of cell type proportions in the brain (70), serving as a major mechanism for feedback from bGRN to NN, and thus to future behavior.”
From Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain (2020) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Whitfield, J. W., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342828 · Cited by 8,017
The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction*
Gundersen, H. J. G., & Jensen, E. B. V. (1987) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02837.x · Cited by 3,519
GUNDERSEN, H. J. G., BENDTSEN, T. F., KORBO, L., MARCUSSEN, N., MØLLER, A., NIELSEN, K., NYENGAARD, J. R., PAKKENBERG, B., SØRENSEN, F. B., VESTERBY, A., et al. (1988) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb05320.x · Cited by 2,929
Winston, M. L. (1987) · Cited by 2,071
A Method for the Combined Staining of Cells and Fibers in the Nervous System
Klüver, H., & Barrera, E. (1953) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-195312040-00008 · Cited by 1,724
Regulation of Division of Labor in Insect Societies
Robinson, G. E. (1992) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225 · Cited by 1,106
Self-citationStructure and function in the nervous systems of invertebrates
Bullock, T. H., Horridge, G. A., Bern, H. A., Hagedorn, I. R., & Smith, J. E. (1965) · Cited by 1,042
Harris, K. M., & Kater, S. B. (1994) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.002013 · Cited by 1,024
Psychobiology of plasticity: Effects of training and experience on brain and behavior
Rosenzweig, M. R., & Bennett, E. L. (1996) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(95)00216-2 · Cited by 972
Cited by
Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers
Leonard, A. S., & Masek, P. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0904-4 · Cited by 161
Neural Mechanisms of Reward in Insects
Perry, C. J., & Barron, A. B. (2013) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153631 · Cited by 135
Can insects feel pain? A review of the neural and behavioural evidence
(2022) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/bs.aiip.2022.10.001 · Cited by 121
On Being Small: Brain Allometry in Ants
Wehner, R., Fukushi, T., & Isler, K. (2007) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000097057 · Cited by 89
Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain
Sinha, S., Jones, B. M., Traniello, I. M., Bukhari, S. A., Halfon, M. S., Hofmann, H. A., Huang, S., Katz, P. S., Keagy, J., Lynch, V. J., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921625117 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Farris, S. M., Robinson, G. E., & Fahrbach, S. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2001-08-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6395-6404
- ISSN
- 0270-6474
- 1529-2401
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 55
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience- and Age-Related Outgrowth of Intrinsic Neurons in the Mushroom Bodies of the Adult Worker Honeybee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-06395.2001
- The paper
- Farris, S. M., Robinson, G. E., & Fahrbach, S. E. (2001). Experience- and Age-Related Outgrowth of Intrinsic Neurons in the Mushroom Bodies of the Adult Worker Honeybee. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-06395.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.