Cited by 228Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchEstrogen and related hormone effectsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Estrogen regulates functional inhibition of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells in the adult female rat

Open access
Rudick, Charles N., Woolley, Catherine S.·2001·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous studies have focused considerable attention on the effects of estrogen on excitatory synaptic input to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Estrogen increases the density of dendritic spines and synapses on CA1 pyramidal cells and increases the sensitivity of these cells to excitatory synaptic input. Little is known, however, about the effects of estrogen on inhibitory synaptic input to CA1 pyramidal cells. We have used immunohistochemistry for glutamic acid decarboxylase and whole-cell voltage-clamp recording of IPSCs and EPSCs at multiple time points after estrogen treatment to (1) investigate estrogen regulation of synaptic inhibition in CA1 and (2) evaluate how estrogen affects the interaction between inhibitory and excitatory input to CA1 pyramidal cells. We find that estrogen transiently suppresses GABA(A)-mediated inhibition of CA1 pyramidal cells at a time point before changes in excitatory input to these cells occur. This finding is consistent with the suggestion that transient disinhibition of CA1 pyramidal cells is involved in estrogen-induced dendritic spine formation. We have also found that at a later time after estrogen, inhibition of CA1 pyramidal cells recovers in parallel with enhancement of NMDA-mediated excitatory input. The concurrent enhancement of GABA(A) and NMDA-mediated input to CA1 pyramidal cells restores a balance of excitatory and inhibitory input to these cells and increases the potential dynamic range of CA1 pyramidal cell responses to synaptic input.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.21-17-06532.2001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estrogen is synthesized in the hippocampus and increases intrinsic neuronal excitability and long-term potentiation in the hippocampus while decreasing inhibitory transmission.

    “Synthesized in the hippocampus, estrogen is shown to increase intrinsic neuronal excitability and long-term potentiation in the hippocampus (Christian et al., 2020) while decreasing inhibitory transmission (Rudick and Woolley, 2001).”

    From APOE4 reduces hippocampal expression of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 and sodium potassium pump to enhance seizure susceptibility in mice (2026) · cites this paper as Rudick and Woolley, 2001

    Rudick and Woolley support the part attached to their citation: the Abstract reports that estrogen transiently suppresses GABAₐ-mediated inhibition of CA1 pyramidal cells in adult female rats. The claim omits that this decrease is temporary; the Abstract and the section “Dynamic balance of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input” report that inhibition later recovers and is enhanced relative to controls. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Erlander MG, Tobin AJ (1991) The structural and functional heteroge- neity of glutamic acid decarboxylase: a review. Neurochem Res 16:215-226.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudick, C. N., & Woolley, C. S.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
21
Issue
17
Pages
6532-6543
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2103715310
Cited by
228
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (NS37324)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM08061, T32GM008061)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS37324, R29NS037324, R01NS037324)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
estrogen, CA1 pyramidal neurons, synaptic inhibition, GABAA receptor, NMDA receptor, inhibitory postsynaptic currents, excitatory postsynaptic currents, dendritic spine formation, excitation-inhibition balance, synaptic plasticity, female rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Electric Stimulation, Estradiol, Estrogens, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Hippocampus, Immunohistochemistry, Isoenzymes, Neural Inhibition, Ovariectomy, Receptors, GABA-A, Synapses, Tetrodotoxin, Time Factors, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pyramidal Cells, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review