The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model
Open accessAbstract
Ever since Pliny the Elder coined the term tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of an external sound source has remained enigmatic. Traditional theories assume that tinnitus is triggered by cochlear damage, but many tinnitus patients present with a normal audiogram, i.e., with no direct signs of cochlear damage. Here, we report that in human subjects with tinnitus and a normal audiogram, auditory brainstem responses show a significantly reduced amplitude of the wave I potential (generated by primary auditory nerve fibers) but normal amplitudes of the more centrally generated wave V. This provides direct physiological evidence of “hidden hearing loss” that manifests as reduced neural output from the cochlea, and consequent renormalization of neuronal response magnitude within the brainstem. Employing an established computational model, we demonstrate how tinnitus could arise from a homeostatic response of neurons in the central auditory system to reduced auditory nerve input in the absence of elevated hearing thresholds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons
Turrigiano, G. G., Leslie, K. R., Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C., & Nelson, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36103 · Cited by 2,226
Vale, C., & Sanes, D. H. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02302.x · Cited by 166
Cited by
Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus
Martinez-Devesa, P., Perera, R., Theodoulou, M., & Waddell, A. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005233.pub3 · Cited by 477
Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus — triggers, mechanisms and treatment
Shore, S. E., Roberts, L. E., & Langguth, B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.12 · Cited by 474
Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis
Auerbach, B. D., Rodrigues, P. V., & Salvi, R. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00206 · Cited by 439
A multidisciplinary European guideline for tinnitus: diagnostics, assessment, and treatment
Cima, R. F. F., Mazurek, B., Haider, H., Kikidis, D., Lapira, A., Noreña, A., & Hoare, D. J. (2019) · HNO · doi:10.1007/s00106-019-0633-7 · Cited by 442
A review of hyperacusis and future directions: Part I. Definitions and manifestations
Tyler, R. S., Pienkowski, M., Roncancio, E. R., Jun, H. J., Brozoski, T., Dauman, N., Coelho, C. B., Andersson, G., Keiner, A. J., Cacace, A. T., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1044/2014_aja-14-0010 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaette, R., & McAlpine, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-09-21
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 13452-13457
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2056829537
- Cited by
- 1,009
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2156-11.2011
- The paper
- Schaette, R., & McAlpine, D. (2011). Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2156-11.2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.