Cited by 269Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchExtracellular vesicles in disease

Endosomal Compartments Serve Multiple Hippocampal Dendritic Spines from a Widespread Rather Than a Local Store of Recycling Membrane

Open access
Cooney, James R., Hurlburt, Jamie L., Selig, David K., Harris, Kristen M., Fiala, John C.·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Endosomes are essential to dendritic and synaptic function in sorting membrane proteins for degradation or recycling, yet little is known about their locations near synapses. Here, serial electron microscopy was used to ascertain the morphology and distribution of all membranous intracellular compartments in distal dendrites of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in juvenile and adult rats. First, the continuous network of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) was traced throughout dendritic segments and their spines. SER occupied the cortex of the dendritic shaft and extended into 14% of spines. Several types of non-SER compartments were then identified, including clathrin-coated vesicles and pits, large uncoated vesicles, tubular compartments, multivesicular bodies (MVBs), and MVB–tubule complexes. The uptake of extracellular gold particles indicated that these compartments were endosomal in origin. Small, round vesicles and pits that did not contain gold were also identified. The tubular compartments exhibited clathrin-coated tips consistent with the genesis of these small, presumably exosomal vesicles. Approximately 70% of the non-SER compartments were located within or at the base of dendritic spines. Overall, only 29% of dendritic spines had endosomal compartments, whereas 20% contained small vesicles. Small vesicles did not colocalize in spines with endosomes or SER. Three-dimensional reconstructions revealed that up to 20 spines shared a recycling pool of plasmalemmal proteins rather than maintaining independent stores at each spine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-06-02215.2002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LTP increases spine volume, a process that requires the addition of membranes whose source remains largely unknown.

    “In particular, LTP increases spine volume, a process that requires the addition of membranes whose source remains largely unknown”

    From Ral mediates activity‐dependent growth of postsynaptic membranes via recruitment of the exocyst (2013) · cites this paper as Cooney et al, 2002

    The Discussion (page unavailable) addresses the possible sources of synaptic receptors inserted during LTP, not membrane added as spines enlarge. Searches for LTP-related spine volume, enlargement, and membrane addition found no passage in our copy stating that LTP increases spine volume or that the source of membrane for such growth is largely unknown. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooney, J. R., Hurlburt, J. L., Selig, D. K., Harris, K. M., & Fiala, J. C.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-03-15
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
2215-2224
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2163895781
Cited by
269
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS21184)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH/DA 57351)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA057351)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS033574, R01NS021184, NS21184, NS33574, R37NS021184)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
endosomes, dendritic spines, CA1 pyramidal neurons, membrane recycling, smooth endoplasmic reticulum, multivesicular bodies, clathrin-coated vesicles, exosomes, dendritic compartmentalization, membrane protein degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Compartmentation, Cell Membrane, Dendrites, Endocytosis, Exocytosis, Hippocampus, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Endosomes, Gold Compounds, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Smooth, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review