The role of rat medial frontal cortex in effort-based decision making
Open accessAbstract
We conducted a series of experiments to elucidate the role of rat medial frontal cortex (MFC) (including prelimbic, infralimbic, and cingulate cortices) in effort-based decision making. Rats were trained on a cost-benefit T-maze task in which they could either choose to climb a barrier to obtain a high reward in one arm (HR arm) or could obtain a small reward in the other with no barrier present (LR arm). Before surgery, all animals were selecting the HR arm on almost every trial. However, after excitotoxic lesions to MFC, the rats shifted to selecting the LR arm on almost every trial. This was not caused by a spatial memory or motor deficit because the same rats returned to selecting the HR arm when the amount of effort needed to be expended to obtain reward in either arm was equalized by putting an identical barrier in the LR arm. Additional experiments demonstrated that the change in effort-based decisions observed in the rats was not caused by a complete insensitivity to reward and effort because they returned to choosing the HR arm if either the cost was reduced (by making the barrier smaller) or the benefit was increased (increasing the food ratio differential). Instead, the MFC lesion shifted the animals' decision criterion, making them more likely to choose the LR arm than the sham-lesioned animals. These results imply that medial frontal cortex is important for allowing the animal to put in more work to obtain greater rewards.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medial frontal lesions affect effort-based decision making.
“Similar lesions also affect effort-based decision making (Walton et al., 2002).”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Walton et al., 2002
dACC/dmPFC neurons signal the net value of rewards associated with effort.
“In addition, single-unit studies have shown that dACC/dmPFC neurons signal the net value of rewards associated with effort, and the necessity of this region in cost–benefit valuation has been demonstrated by lesion studies that report that inactivation of medial prefrontal cortex impairs an animal’s ability to overcome effort costs [15, 16, 25, 48, 55].”
From Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying subjective valuation of effort costs (2017) · cites this paper as [16]
Inactivation of medial prefrontal cortex impairs an animal's ability to overcome effort costs.
“In addition, single-unit studies have shown that dACC/dmPFC neurons signal the net value of rewards associated with effort, and the necessity of this region in cost–benefit valuation has been demonstrated by lesion studies that report that inactivation of medial prefrontal cortex impairs an animal’s ability to overcome effort costs [15, 16, 25, 48, 55].”
From Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying subjective valuation of effort costs (2017) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 364
- Authors
- Walton, M. E., Bannerman, D. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-12-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 10996-11003
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6758435
- OpenAlex
- W2113531708
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- medial frontal cortex, effort-based decision making, T-maze task, excitotoxic lesions, prelimbic cortex, infralimbic cortex, cingulate cortex, decision criterion, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Decision Making, Denervation, Feeding Behavior, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Limbic System, Male, Reward, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review