The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Sex Matters: Brain Size Independent Differences in Gray Matter Distributions between Men and Women
Open accessAbstract
The different brain anatomy of men and women is both a classic and continuing topic of major interest. Among the most replicated and robust sex differences are larger overall brain dimensions in men, and relative increases of global and regional gray matter (GM) in women. However, the question remains whether sex-typical differences in brain size (i.e., larger male and smaller female brains) or biological sex itself account for the observed sex effects on tissue amount and distribution. Exploring cerebral structures in men and women with similar brain size may clarify the true contribution of biological sex. We thus examined a sample of 24 male and 24 female subjects with brains identical in size, in addition to 24 male and 24 female subjects with considerable brain size differences. Using this large set of brains (n= 96), we applied a well validated and automated voxel-based approach to examine regional volumes of GM. While we revealed significant main effects of sex, there were no significant effects of brain size (and no significant interactions between sex and brain size). When conducting post hoc tests, we revealed a number of regions where women had larger GM volumes than men. Importantly, these sex effects remained evident when comparing men and women with the same brain size. Altogether, our findings suggest that the observed increased regional GM volumes in female brains constitute sex-dependent redistributions of tissue volume, rather than individual adjustments attributable to brain size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04065.1999 · Cited by 909
Cited by
Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences
Mielke, M., Vemuri, P., & Rocca, W. (2014) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s37929 · Cited by 1,021
Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Jiang, T., Zhou, B., An, N., Dai, H., Wang, P., Niu, Y., Wang, L., & Zhang, X. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.049 · Cited by 255
Dennis, E. L., Jahanshad, N., McMahon, K. L., de Zubicaray, G. I., Martin, N. G., Hickie, I. B., Toga, A. W., Wright, M. J., & Thompson, P. M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.004 · Cited by 222
Self-citationThe effect of sex on multiple sclerosis risk and disease progression
Voskuhl, R. R. (2020) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458519892491 · Cited by 113
Sex differences: Transcriptional signatures of stress exposure in male and female brains
Brivio, E., Lopez, J. P., & Chen, A. (2020) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12643 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Luders, E., Gaser, C., Narr, K. L., & Toga, A. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-11-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 14265-14270
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1996317444
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Sex Matters: Brain Size Independent Differences in Gray Matter Distributions between Men and Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2261-09.2009
- The paper
- Luders, E., Gaser, C., Narr, K. L., & Toga, A. W. (2009). Why Sex Matters: Brain Size Independent Differences in Gray Matter Distributions between Men and Women. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2261-09.2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.