Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) as a Target of Oxidative Stress-Mediated Damage: Cochlear and Cortical Responses after an Increase in Antioxidant Defense

Open access
Fetoni, Anna Rita, De Bartolo, Paola, Eramo, Sara Letizia Maria, Rolesi, Rolando, Paciello, Fabiola, Bergamini, Christian, Fato, Romana, Paludetti, Gaetano, Petrosini, Laura, Troiani, Diana·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

This study addresses the relationship between cochlear oxidative damage and auditory cortical injury in a rat model of repeated noise exposure. To test the effect of increased antioxidant defenses, a water-soluble coenzyme Q 10 analog (Q ter) was used. We analyzed auditory function, cochlear oxidative stress, morphological alterations in auditory cortices and cochlear structures, and levels of coenzymes Q 9 and Q 10(CoQ 9 and CoQ 10, respectively) as indicators of endogenous antioxidant capability. We report three main results. First, hearing loss and damage in hair cells and spiral ganglion was determined by noise-induced oxidative stress. Second, the acoustic trauma altered dendritic morphology and decreased spine number of II–III and V–VI layer pyramidal neurons of auditory cortices. Third, the systemic administration of the water-soluble CoQ 10 analog reduced oxidative-induced cochlear damage, hearing loss, and cortical dendritic injury. Furthermore, cochlear levels of CoQ 9 and CoQ 10 content increased. These findings indicate that antioxidant treatment restores auditory cortical neuronal morphology and hearing function by reducing the noise-induced redox imbalance in the cochlea and the deafferentation effects upstream the acoustic pathway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2282-12.2013

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Fetoni, A. R., De Bartolo, P., Eramo, S. L. M., Rolesi, R., Paciello, F., Bergamini, C., Fato, R., Paludetti, G., Petrosini, L., & Troiani, D.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-02-27
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
4011-4023
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2131847074
Cited by
213
References
5
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) as a Target of Oxidative Stress-Mediated Damage: Cochlear and Cortical Responses after an Increase in Antioxidant Defense. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2282-12.2013
The paper
Fetoni, A. R., De Bartolo, P., Eramo, S. L. M., Rolesi, R., Paciello, F., Bergamini, C., Fato, R., Paludetti, G., Petrosini, L., & Troiani, D. (2013). Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) as a Target of Oxidative Stress-Mediated Damage: Cochlear and Cortical Responses after an Increase in Antioxidant Defense. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2282-12.2013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.