The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barrages of Synaptic Activity Control the Gain and Sensitivity of Cortical Neurons
Open accessAbstract
Ongoing synaptic activity, ever present in cortical neurons, may vary widely in its amplitude and characteristics, potentially having a strong influence on neuronal processing. Intracellular recordings in layer 5 pyramidal cells in prefrontal and visual cortical slices maintained in vitro revealed spontaneous periods of synaptic bombardment. Testing the responsiveness of these cortical cells to synaptic inputs or the injection of artificial excitatory postsynaptic conductances of various amplitudes revealed that background synaptic activity dramatically increased the probability of response to small inputs, decreased the slope of the input-output curve, and decreased both the latency and jitter of action potential activation. Examining the effects of different components of synaptic barrages (namely, depolarization, increase in membrane conductance, and increase in membrane potential variance) revealed that the effects observed were dominated by the membrane depolarization and increase in variance. Depolarization increased the peak cross-correlation between injected complex in vivo-like waveforms through enhancement of responsiveness to small inputs, whereas increases in variance did so through a shift in firing mode from one of threshold detection to probabilistic discharge. These results indicate that rapid increases in neuronal responsiveness, as well as increases in spike timing precision, can be achieved through balanced barrages of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Changes in the level of synaptically driven fluctuations in Vm (also called synaptic fluctuations or synaptic noise) may regulate the gain of the I/O curve for individual neurons57–60 (but see REF.61).”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Together, temporally coincident changes in conductance state and synaptic fluctuations exert a powerful effect on neuronal gain at the single-cell level57,58,60,61,83,84.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Unlike synaptically driven Vm fluctuations, changes in membrane conductance and depolarization cause lateral, or additive, shifts in the I/O transfer function of a neuron without changes in neuronal gain57,58,60,61,83,84.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Theory of the Brownian Motion
Uhlenbeck, G. E., & Ornstein, L. S. (1930) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.36.823 · Cited by 4,713
Steriade, M., Nunez, A., & Amzica, F. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-08-03252.1993 · Cited by 1,903
Cellular and network mechanisms of rhythmic recurrent activity in neocortex
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & McCormick, D. A. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/79848 · Cited by 1,539
Self-citationFeature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex
Treue, S., & Trujillo, J. C. M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21176 · Cited by 1,465
Encoding of Spatial Location by Posterior Parietal Neurons
Andersen, R., Essick, G. K., & Siegel, R. M. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4048942 · Cited by 1,413
Abeles, M. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511574566 · Cited by 1,341
Natural waking and sleep states: a view from inside neocortical neurons
Steriade, M., Timofeev, I., & Grenier, F. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.85.5.1969 · Cited by 1,296
Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4
McAdams, C. J., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1999) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-01-00431.1999 · Cited by 1,218
Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity
Shu, Y., Hasenstaub, A., & McCormick, D. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01616 · Cited by 1,054
Self-citationAttention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons
Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81206-4 · Cited by 1,034
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1988, Exp Brain Res, 70, 463
- 1993, Trends Neurosci, 17, 147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2258 · Cited by 2,883
Spike Timing–Dependent Plasticity: A Hebbian Learning Rule
Caporale, N., & Dan, Y. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125639 · Cited by 1,997
How Inhibition Shapes Cortical Activity
Isaacson, J. S., & Scanziani, M. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.027 · Cited by 1,678
The Normalization Model of Attention
Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002 · Cited by 1,457
Attentional modulation of visual processing
Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039 · Cited by 1,158
Metadata
- Authors
- Shu, Y., Hasenstaub, A., Badoual, M., Bal, T., & McCormick, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-11-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 10388-10401
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6741011
- OpenAlex
- W1955923252
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (IST-2001-34712)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
- Keywords
- cortical neurons, layer 5 pyramidal cells, prefrontal cortex, visual cortex, neuronal gain, neuronal sensitivity, input-output curves, membrane depolarization, spike timing precision, threshold detection, excitation-inhibition balance, spontaneous synaptic activity
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Electric Stimulation, Ferrets, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Occipital Lobe, Reaction Time, Sensory Thresholds, Prefrontal Cortex, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
