The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Spike Generation Mechanisms Determine the Neuronal Response to Fluctuating Inputs
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the ability of neurons to track temporally varying inputs, namely by investigating how the instantaneous firing rate of a neuron is modulated by a noisy input with a small sinusoidal component with frequency (f). Using numerical simulations of conductance-based neurons and analytical calculations of one-variable nonlinear integrate-and-fire neurons, we characterized the dependence of this modulation on f. For sufficiently high noise, the neuron acts as a low-pass filter. The modulation amplitude is approximately constant for frequencies up to a cutoff frequency, fc, after which it decays. The cutoff frequency increases almost linearly with the firing rate. For higher frequencies, the modulation amplitude decays as C/falpha, where the power alpha depends on the spike initiation mechanism. For conductance-based models, alpha = 1, and the prefactor C depends solely on the average firing rate and a spike "slope factor," which determines the sharpness of the spike initiation. These results are attributable to the fact that near threshold, the sodium activation variable can be approximated by an exponential function. Using this feature, we propose a simplified one-variable model, the "exponential integrate-and-fire neuron," as an approximation of a conductance-based model. We show that this model reproduces the dynamics of a simple conductance-based model extremely well. Our study shows how an intrinsic neuronal property (the characteristics of fast sodium channels) determines the speed with which neurons can track changes in input.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony
Ermentrout, B. (1996) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1996.8.5.979 · Cited by 1,001
Cell‐attached measurements of the firing threshold of rat hippocampal neurones
Fricker, D., Verheugen, J. A. H., & Miles, R. (1999) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0791s.x · Cited by 160
How Noise Contributes to Contrast Invariance of Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex
Hansel, D., & van Vreeswijk, C. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-12-05118.2002 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Cited by
Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning
Buzsáki, G. (2015) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22488 · Cited by 1,759
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input
Burkitt, A. N. (2006) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0068-6 · Cited by 1,208
Fractional differentiation by neocortical pyramidal neurons
Lundstrom, B. N., Higgs, M. H., Spain, W. J., & Fairhall, A. L. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2212 · Cited by 678
Unique features of action potential initiation in cortical neurons
Naundorf, B., Wolf, F., & Volgushev, M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04610 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Fourcaud-Trocmé, N., Hansel, D., van Vreeswijk, C., & Brunel, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-12-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 11628-11640
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2141166794
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Spike Generation Mechanisms Determine the Neuronal Response to Fluctuating Inputs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.23-37-11628.2003
- The paper
- Fourcaud-Trocmé, N., Hansel, D., van Vreeswijk, C., & Brunel, N. (2003). How Spike Generation Mechanisms Determine the Neuronal Response to Fluctuating Inputs. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-37-11628.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.