Cited by 233Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Nucleation-Dependent Polymerization Is an Essential Component of Amyloid-Mediated Neuronal Cell Death

Open access
Wogulis, Mark, Wright, Sarah, Cunningham, Damian, Chilcote, Tamie, Powell, Kyle, Rydel, Russell E.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that amyloid protein aggregation is pathogenic in many diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. However, the mechanisms by which protein aggregation mediates cellular dysfunction and overt cell death are unknown. Recent reports have focused on the potential role of amyloid oligomers or protofibrils as a neurotoxic form of amyloid-β (Aβ) and related amyloid aggregates. Here we describe studies indicating that overt neuronal cell death mediated by Aβ 1-40 is critically dependent on ongoing Aβ 1-40 polymerization and is not mediated by a single stable species of neurotoxic aggregate. The extent and rate of neuronal cell death can be controlled by conditions that alter the rate of Aβ polymerization. The results presented here indicate that protofibrils and oligomeric forms of Aβ most likely generate neuronal cell death through a nucleation-dependent process rather than acting as direct neurotoxic ligands. These findings bring into question the use of the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide formazan assay (MTT assay) as a reporter of Aβ-mediated neuronal cell death and suggest that diffusible Aβ protofibrils and oligomers more likely mediate subtle alterations of synaptic function and long-term potentiation rather than overt neuronal cell death. These results have been extended to Aβ 1-42, the non-Aβ component of Alzheimer's disease amyloid plaques, and human amylin, suggesting that nucleation-dependent polymerization is a common mechanism of amyloid-mediated neuronal cell death. Our findings indicate that ongoing amyloid fibrillogenesis may be an essential mechanistic process underlying the pathogenesis associated with protein aggregation in amyloid disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2381-04.2005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Alamar Blue cell viability assay has been shown to give more reproducible results than the MTT assay.

    “using an Alamar Blue cell viability assay, which has been shown to give more reproducible results than the MTT assay.93,94”

    From Bifunctional Compounds for Controlling Metal-Mediated Aggregation of the Aβ<sub>42</sub>Peptide (2012) · cites this paper as [93]

    In the section on MTT as an indicator of Aβ-mediated neuronal cell death (page unavailable), alamarBlue and other assays did not show the apparent loss of viability indicated by MTT. The paper therefore supports a difference in reliability for this specific application, but does not show that alamarBlue gives more reproducible results than MTT. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Alamar Blue cell assay is more appropriate for Aβ toxicity studies than the MTT assay.

    “The viability of Neuro-2A (N2A) cells57 was probed using the Alamar Blue cell assay, which was shown to be more appropriate for Aβ toxicity studies vs. the MTT assay.58,59”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wogulis, M., Wright, S., Cunningham, D., Chilcote, T., Powell, K., & Rydel, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Ireland) (IE)
  • Biogen (United States) (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-02-02
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
1071-1080
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1995309381
Cited by
233
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA092191, P01CA095616)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, neuronal cell death, amyloid protofibrils, amyloid oligomers, Alzheimer's disease, amylin, amyloid fibril formation, MTT assay, synaptic function, long-term potentiation, protein aggregation
MeSH terms
Amyloid, Biopolymers, Cell Membrane Permeability, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Crystallization, Coloring Agents, Formazans, Humans, Models, Chemical, Neurons, Oxidation-Reduction, Peptide Fragments, Solubility, Structure-Activity Relationship, Tetrazolium Salts, Thiazoles, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Artifacts, Cell Death, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Islet Amyloid Polypeptide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review