Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of a GCaMP Calcium Indicator for Neural Activity Imaging

Open access
Akerboom, Jasper, Chen, Tsai-Wen, Wardill, Trevor J., Tian, Lin, Marvin, Jonathan S., Mutlu, Sevinç, Calderón, Nicole Carreras, Esposti, Federico, Borghuis, Bart G., Sun, Xiaonan Richard, Gordus, Andrew, Orger, Michael B., Portugues, Ruben, Engert, Florian, Macklin, John J., Filosa, Alessandro, Aggarwal, Aman, Kerr, Rex A., Takagi, Ryousuke, Kracun, Sebastian, Shigetomi, Eiji, Khakh, Baljit S., Baier, Herwig, Lagnado, Leon, Wang, Samuel S.-H., Bargmann, Cornelia I., Kimmel, Bruce E., Jayaraman, Vivek, Svoboda, Karel, Kim, Douglas S., Schreiter, Eric R., Looger, Loren L.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) are powerful tools for systems neuroscience. Recent efforts in protein engineering have significantly increased the performance of GECIs. The state-of-the art single-wavelength GECI, GCaMP3, has been deployed in a number of model organisms and can reliably detect three or more action potentials in short bursts in several systems in vivo . Through protein structure determination, targeted mutagenesis, high-throughput screening, and a battery of in vitro assays, we have increased the dynamic range of GCaMP3 by severalfold, creating a family of “GCaMP5” sensors. We tested GCaMP5s in several systems: cultured neurons and astrocytes, mouse retina, and in vivo in Caenorhabditis chemosensory neurons, Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction and adult antennal lobe, zebrafish retina and tectum, and mouse visual cortex. Signal-to-noise ratio was improved by at least 2- to 3-fold. In the visual cortex, two GCaMP5 variants detected twice as many visual stimulus-responsive cells as GCaMP3. By combining in vivo imaging with electrophysiology we show that GCaMP5 fluorescence provides a more reliable measure of neuronal activity than its predecessor GCaMP3. GCaMP5 allows more sensitive detection of neural activity in vivo and may find widespread applications for cellular imaging in general.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2601-12.2012

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 1,223

Metadata

Authors
Akerboom, J., Chen, T.-W., Wardill, T. J., Tian, L., Marvin, J. S., Mutlu, S., Calderón, N. C., Esposti, F., Borghuis, B. G., Sun, X. R., Gordus, A., Orger, M. B., Portugues, R., Engert, F., Macklin, J. J., Filosa, A., Aggarwal, A., Kerr, R. A., Takagi, R., Kracun, S., Shigetomi, E., Khakh, B. S., Baier, H., Lagnado, L., Wang, S. S.-H., Bargmann, C. I., Kimmel, B. E., Jayaraman, V., Svoboda, K., Kim, D. S., Schreiter, E. R., & Looger, L. L.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-10-03
Volume
32
Issue
40
Pages
13819-13840
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2080092859
Cited by
1,223
References
7
FWCI
46.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of a GCaMP Calcium Indicator for Neural Activity Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2601-12.2012
The paper
Akerboom, J., Chen, T.-W., Wardill, T. J., Tian, L., Marvin, J. S., Mutlu, S., Calderón, N. C., Esposti, F., Borghuis, B. G., Sun, X. R., Gordus, A., Orger, M. B., Portugues, R., Engert, F., Macklin, J. J., Filosa, A., Aggarwal, A., Kerr, R. A., Takagi, R., . . . Looger, L. L. (2012). Optimization of a GCaMP Calcium Indicator for Neural Activity Imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2601-12.2012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.