The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Processing in the Primate Basal Ganglia during Sensory-Guided and Internally Driven Rhythmic Tapping
Open accessAbstract
Gamma (γ) and beta (β) oscillations seem to play complementary functions in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuit (CBGT) during motor behavior. We investigated the time-varying changes of the putaminal spiking activity and the spectral power of local field potentials (LFPs) during a task where the rhythmic tapping of monkeys was guided by isochronous stimuli separated by a fixed duration (synchronization phase), followed by a period of internally timed movements (continuation phase). We found that the power of both bands and the discharge rate of cells showed an orderly change in magnitude as a function of the duration and/or the serial order of the intervals executed rhythmically. More LFPs were tuned to duration and/or serial order in the β- than the γ-band, although different values of preferred features were represented by single cells and by both bands. Importantly, in the LFPs tuned to serial order, there was a strong bias toward the continuation phase for the β-band when aligned to movements, and a bias toward the synchronization phase for the γ-band when aligned to the stimuli. Our results suggest that γ-oscillations reflect local computations associated with stimulus processing, whereas β-activity involves the entrainment of large putaminal circuits, probably in conjunction with other elements of CBGT, during internally driven rhythmic tapping.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buzsáki, G. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001 · Cited by 4,873
The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A., & Koch, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3241 · Cited by 4,225
CircStat : A MATLAB Toolbox for Circular Statistics
Berens, P. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v031.i10 · Cited by 3,099
Beta-band oscillations—Signalling the status quo?
Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015 · Cited by 2,953
Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop
Parent, A., & Hazrati, L.-N. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c · Cited by 2,161
Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation
Fries, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603 · Cited by 1,713
The primate basal ganglia: Parallel and integrative networks
Haber, S. N. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2003.10.003 · Cited by 1,479
Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012).
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2 · Cited by 1,204
Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties
Kopell, N., Ermentrout, G. B., Whittington, M. A., & Traub, R. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.4.1867 · Cited by 1,072 · cited 2×
“On the other hand, -bursts have been associated with sensory cued bottom-up behaviors in cortical and subcortical areas (Kopell et al., 2000; Berke, 2009; Fries, 2009).”
BackgroundDifferential roles of monkey striatum in learning of sequential hand movement
Miyachi, S., Hikosaka, O., Miyashita, K., Kárádi, Z., & Rand, M. K. (1997) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/pl00005669 · Cited by 374
Cited by
Kononowicz, T. W., van Rijn, H., & Meck, W. H. (2018) · Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn114 · Cited by 756
Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation
Spitzer, B., & Haegens, S. (2017) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0170-17.2017 · Cited by 615
Dehaene, S., Meyniel, F., Wacongne, C., Wang, L., & Pallier, C. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.019 · Cited by 478
Patel, A. D., & Iversen, J. R. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00057 · Cited by 516
Fontolan, L., Morillon, B., Liegeois-Chauvel, C., & Giraud, A.-L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5694 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartolo, R., Prado, L., & Merchant, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014-03-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3910-3923
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2068613589
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Processing in the Primate Basal Ganglia during Sensory-Guided and Internally Driven Rhythmic Tapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2679-13.2014
- The paper
- Bartolo, R., Prado, L., & Merchant, H. (2014). Information Processing in the Primate Basal Ganglia during Sensory-Guided and Internally Driven Rhythmic Tapping. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2679-13.2014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.