Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 756

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Timing and Time Perception: A Critical Review of Neural Timing Signatures Before, During, and After the To‐Be‐Timed Interval

Kononowicz, Tadeusz W., van Rijn, Hedderik, Meck, Warren H.·2018·Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

This chapter reviews recent human and nonhuman animal studies investigating neural signatures of time estimation. Investigation of the neural correlates of time estimation as measured by electrophysiology, electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans and other animals has largely been focused on the to‐be‐timed period. Climbing neural activity (e.g., ramping) originating from the supplementary motor area has been implicated as a primary neural marker that coincides with the development of subjective experience of duration. However, it has recently been questioned whether such climbing neural activity directly reflects the neural mechanism(s) underpinning the sense of time. Given that the neural signatures recorded during the to‐be‐timed period are insufficient to explain various aspects of interval timing, this has led to the consideration of processes influencing timing before and after the to‐be‐timed period. Because many of these signatures are linked with the supplementary motor area, an extended discussion of the role of this cortical structure in timing and time perception is provided. These neural correlates are interpreted in light of contemporary theories of interval timing, such as the striatal beat frequency model. Future directions for the investigation of the functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn114

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 756

Metadata

Authors
Kononowicz, T. W., van Rijn, H., & Meck, W. H.
Venue
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-23
Pages
1-38
OpenAlex
W2808691534
Cited by
756
References
20
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing and Time Perception: A Critical Review of Neural Timing Signatures Before, During, and After the To‐Be‐Timed Interval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn114
The paper
Kononowicz, T. W., van Rijn, H., & Meck, W. H. (2018). Timing and Time Perception: A Critical Review of Neural Timing Signatures Before, During, and After the To‐Be‐Timed Interval. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.