The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontal Eye Fields Control Attentional Modulation of Alpha and Gamma Oscillations in Contralateral Occipitoparietal Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Covertly directing visuospatial attention produces a frequency-specific modulation of neuronal oscillations in occipital and parietal cortices: anticipatory alpha (8–12 Hz) power decreases contralateral and increases ipsilateral to attention, whereas stimulus-induced gamma (>40 Hz) power is boosted contralaterally and attenuated ipsilaterally. These modulations must be under top-down control; however, the control mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Here we investigated the causal contribution of the human frontal eye field (FEF) by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subsequent magnetoencephalography. Following inhibitory theta burst stimulation to the left FEF, right FEF, or vertex, participants performed a visual discrimination task requiring covert attention to either visual hemifield. Both left and right FEF TMS caused marked attenuation of alpha modulation in the occipitoparietal cortex. Notably, alpha modulation was consistently reduced in the hemisphere contralateral to stimulation, leaving the ipsilateral hemisphere relatively unaffected. Additionally, right FEF TMS enhanced gamma modulation in left visual cortex. Behaviorally, TMS caused a relative slowing of response times to targets contralateral to stimulation during the early task period. Our results suggest that left and right FEF are causally involved in the attentional top-down control of anticipatory alpha power in the contralateral visual system, whereas a right-hemispheric dominance seems to exist for control of stimulus-induced gamma power. These findings contrast the assumption of primarily intrahemispheric connectivity between FEF and parietal cortex, emphasizing the relevance of interhemispheric interactions. The contralaterality of effects may result from a transient functional reorganization of the dorsal attention network after inhibition of either FEF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Rossini, P. M., Barker, A. T., Berardelli, A., Caramia, M. D., Caruso, G., Cracco, R. Q., Dimitrijević, M. R., Hallett, M., Katayama, Y., Lücking, C. H., et al. (1994) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90029-9 · Cited by 3,030
Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex
Ungerleider, S. K. A. L. G. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315 · Cited by 2,159
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80734-5 · Cited by 1,622
A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention
de Schotten, M. T., Dell'Acqua, F., Forkel, S. J., Simmons, A., Vergani, F., Murphy, D. G. M., & Catani, M. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2905 · Cited by 1,103
Kelly, S. P., Lalor, E. C., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01234.2005 · Cited by 715
Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex
Ruff, C. C., Blankenburg, F., Bjoertomt, O., Bestmann, S., Freeman, E., Haynes, J.-D., Rees, G., Josephs, O., Deichmann, R., & Driver, J. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.057 · Cited by 514
Thut, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0115-4 · Cited by 388
Repetitive TMS over the human oculomotor cortex: Comparison of 1-Hz and theta burst stimulation
Nyffeler, T., Wurtz, P., Lüscher, H.-R., Hess, C. W., Senn, W., Pflugshaupt, T., von Wartburg, R., Lüthi, M., & Müri, R. M. (2006) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.011 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Brain Networks and α-Oscillations: Structural and Functional Foundations of Cognitive Control
Sadaghiani, S., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.09.004 · Cited by 437
Inferring Causality from Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience
Bergmann, T. O., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01591 · Cited by 264
Self-citationEarly cortical signals in visual stimulus detection
Kwon, H., Kronemer, S. I., Christison-Lagay, K. L., Khalaf, A., Li, J., Ding, J. Z., Freedman, N. C., & Blumenfeld, H. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118608 · Cited by 31
“This finding corresponds with TMS studies that find specifically the right frontal eye fields influence attentional gamma power modulation in visual cortex (Duecker et al., 2013; Grosbras and Paus, 2002; Marshall et al., 2015; Silvanto et al., 2006).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, T. R., O'Shea, J., Jensen, O., & Bergmann, T. O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2015-01-28
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1638-1647
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1975636862
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 14.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frontal Eye Fields Control Attentional Modulation of Alpha and Gamma Oscillations in Contralateral Occipitoparietal Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3116-14.2015
- The paper
- Marshall, T. R., O'Shea, J., Jensen, O., & Bergmann, T. O. (2015). Frontal Eye Fields Control Attentional Modulation of Alpha and Gamma Oscillations in Contralateral Occipitoparietal Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3116-14.2015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.