Cited by 176

MicroRNA-9 Modulates Cajal–Retzius Cell Differentiation by Suppressing Foxg1 Expression in Mouse Medial Pallium

Shibata, Mikihito, Kurokawa, Daisuke, Nakao, Hiromi, Ohmura, Tomomi, Aizawa, Shinichi·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Vertebrate brain hosts a diverse collection of microRNAs, but little is known about their functions in vivo. Here we propose that mouse microRNA-9(miR-9) targets Foxg1 mRNAs for proper generation of Cajal–Retzius cells in the medial pallium.miR-9 expression is mediolaterally graded, being most intense in the cortical hem; it contrasts with the Foxg1 expression in a reciprocal gradient. The 3′ untranslated regions of tetrapod, but not of teleost,Foxg1 mRNAs conserve miR-9 target sequences and are regulated by miR-9. Gain- and loss-of-function analyses of miR-9 showed that miR-9 negatively regulates endogenous Foxg1 protein level. Moreover,miR-9 overexpression in developing telencephalon at E11.5 by electroporation resulted in ectopic Reelin-positive cells over the cortex beyond the marginal zone. In addition, inhibition of endogenous miR-9 function by antisense oligonucleotides caused the regression of Wnt3a-positive cortical hem and reduction of reelin-,p73-, and NeuroD1-positive cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3219-08.2008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shibata, M., Kurokawa, D., Nakao, H., Ohmura, T., & Aizawa, S.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-10-08
Volume
28
Issue
41
Pages
10415-10421
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
176
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review