The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Maximum Entropy Model Applied to Spatial and Temporal Correlations from Cortical Networks In Vitro
Open accessAbstract
Multineuron firing patterns are often observed, yet are predicted to be rare by models that assume independent firing. To explain these correlated network states, two groups recently applied a second-order maximum entropy model that used only observed firing rates and pairwise interactions as parameters (Schneidman et al., 2006; Shlens et al., 2006). Interestingly, with these minimal assumptions they predicted 90–99% of network correlations. If generally applicable, this approach could vastly simplify analyses of complex networks. However, this initial work was done largely on retinal tissue, and its applicability to cortical circuits is mostly unknown. This work also did not address the temporal evolution of correlated states. To investigate these issues, we applied the model to multielectrode data containing spontaneous spikes or local field potentials from cortical slices and cultures. The model worked slightly less well in cortex than in retina, accounting for 88 ± 7% (mean ± SD) of network correlations. In addition, in 8 of 13 preparations, the observed sequences of correlated states were significantly longer than predicted by concatenating states from the model. This suggested that temporal dependencies are a common feature of cortical network activity, and should be considered in future models. We found a significant relationship between strong pairwise temporal correlations and observed sequence length, suggesting that pairwise temporal correlations may allow the model to be extended into the temporal domain. We conclude that although a second-order maximum entropy model successfully predicts correlated states in cortical networks, it should be extended to account for temporal correlations observed between states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Cellular and network mechanisms of rhythmic recurrent activity in neocortex
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & McCormick, D. A. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/79848 · Cited by 1,539
Highly nonrandom features of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits
Song, S., Sjöström, P. J., Reigl, M., Nelson, S., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030068 · Cited by 1,512
Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity
Braitenberg, V., & Schüz, A. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03733-1 · Cited by 1,178
Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity
Shu, Y., Hasenstaub, A., & McCormick, D. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01616 · Cited by 1,054
Synfire Chains and Cortical Songs: Temporal Modules of Cortical Activity
Ikegaya, Y., Aaron, G., Cossart, R., Aronov, D., Lampl, I., Ferster, D., & Yuste, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093173 · Cited by 838
Attractor dynamics of network UP states in the neocortex
Cossart, R., Aronov, D., & Yuste, R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01614 · Cited by 659
Spatiotemporal Structure of Cortical Activity: Properties and Behavioral Relevance
Prut, Y., Vaadia, E., Bergman, H., Haalman, I., Slovin, H., & Abeles, M. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.2857 · Cited by 300
Cited by
Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality?
Mora, T., & Bialek, W. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-011-0229-4 · Cited by 734
Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain
Beggs, J. M., & Timme, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00163 · Cited by 494
Self-citationRecurrent network models of sequence generation and memory
Rajan, K., Harvey, C. D., & Tank, D. W. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.009 · Cited by 351
A Small World of Neuronal Synchrony
Yu, S., Huang, D., Singer, W., & Nikolić, D. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn047 · Cited by 334
Inverse statistical problems: from the inverse Ising problem to data science
Nguyen, H. C., Zecchina, R., & Berg, J. (2017) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2017.1341604 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, A., Jackson, D., Hobbs, J., Chen, W., Smith, J. L., Patel, H., Prieto, A., Petrusca, D., Grivich, M. I., Sher, A., Hottowy, P., Dabrowski, W., Litke, A. M., & Beggs, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-01-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 505-518
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2047488554
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Maximum Entropy Model Applied to Spatial and Temporal Correlations from Cortical Networks In Vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3359-07.2008
- The paper
- Tang, A., Jackson, D., Hobbs, J., Chen, W., Smith, J. L., Patel, H., Prieto, A., Petrusca, D., Grivich, M. I., Sher, A., Hottowy, P., Dabrowski, W., Litke, A. M., & Beggs, J. M. (2008). A Maximum Entropy Model Applied to Spatial and Temporal Correlations from Cortical Networks In Vitro. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3359-07.2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.