The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sound of Concepts: Four Markers for a Link between Auditory and Conceptual Brain Systems
Open accessAbstract
Traditionally, concepts are conceived as abstract mental entities distinct from perceptual or motor brain systems. However, recent results let assume modality-specific representations of concepts. The ultimate test for grounding concepts in perception requires the fulfillment of the following four markers: conceptual processing during (1) an implicit task should activate (2) a perceptual region (3) rapidly and (4) selectively. Here, we show using functional magnetic resonance imaging and recordings of event-related potentials, that acoustic conceptual features recruit auditory brain areas even when implicitly presented through visual words. Fulfilling the four markers, the findings of our study unequivocally link the auditory and conceptual brain systems: recognition of words denoting objects, for which acoustic features are highly relevant (e.g.,“telephone”), ignited cell assemblies in posterior superior and middle temporal gyri (pSTG/MTG) within 150 ms that were also activated by sound perception. Importantly, activity within a cluster of pSTG/MTG increased selectively as a function of acoustic, but not of visual and action-related feature relevance. The implicitness of the conceptual task, the selective modulation of left pSTG/MTG activity by acoustic feature relevance, the early onset of this activity at 150 ms and its anatomical overlap with perceptual sound processing are four markers for a modality-specific representation of auditory conceptual features in left pSTG/MTG. Our results therefore provide the first direct evidence for a link between perceptual and conceptual acoustic processing. They demonstrate that access to concepts involves a partial reinstatement of brain activity during the perception of objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315799438 · Cited by 6,761
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,136
Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping
Lancaster, J. L., Woldorff, M. G., Parsons, L. M., Liotti, M., Freitas, C. S., Rainey, L., Kochunov, P. V., Nickerson, D., Mikiten, S. A., & Fox, P. T. (2000) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200007)10:3<120::aid-hbm30>3.0.co;2-8 · Cited by 3,387
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2002) · Vision and Mind · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7111.003.0023 · Cited by 3,331
The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge
Gallese †, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290442000310 · Cited by 2,726
Risto, N. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429487354 · Cited by 2,024
Image And Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3653.001.0001 · Cited by 1,977
Brain mechanisms linking language and action
Pulvermüller, F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1706 · Cited by 1,828
Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex
Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., Lafaille, P., Ahad, P., & Pike, B. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002078 · Cited by 1,771
Cited by
Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation
Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426 · Cited by 367
Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics
Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv020 · Cited by 305
McNorgan, C. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00285 · Cited by 178
Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00022 · Cited by 145
N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context
Amoruso, L., Gelormini, C., Aboitiz, F., Alvarez González, M., Manes, F., Cardona, J. F., & Ibanez, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00057 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiefer, M., Sim, E.-J., Herrnberger, B., Grothe, J., & Hoenig, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-11-19
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 12224-12230
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2171298305
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sound of Concepts: Four Markers for a Link between Auditory and Conceptual Brain Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3579-08.2008
- The paper
- Kiefer, M., Sim, E.-J., Herrnberger, B., Grothe, J., & Hoenig, K. (2008). The Sound of Concepts: Four Markers for a Link between Auditory and Conceptual Brain Systems. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3579-08.2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.