The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of Rehabilitative Experience Declines with Time after Focal Ischemic Brain Injury
Open accessAbstract
To maximize the effectiveness of rehabilitative therapies after stroke, it is critical to determine when the brain is most responsive (i.e., plastic) to sensorimotor experience after injury and to focus such efforts within this period. Here, we compared the efficacy of 5 weeks of enriched rehabilitation (ER) initiated at 5 d (ER5), ER14, or ER30 after focal ischemia, as judged by functional outcome and neuromorphological change. ER5 provided marked improvement in skilled forelimb reaching ability and ladder-rung- and narrow-beam-walking tasks and attenuated the stroke-induced reliance on the unaffected forepaw for postural support. ER14 provided improvement to a somewhat lesser extent, whereas recovery was diminished after ER30 such that motor function did not differ from ischemic animals exposed to social housing. To examine potential neural substrates of the improved function, we examined dendritic morphology in the undamaged motor cortex because our previous work ( Biernaskie and Corbett, 2001 ) suggested that recovery was associated with enhanced dendritic growth in this region. ER5 increased the number of branches and complexity of layer V neurons compared with both social housing and control animals. Dendritic arbor after ER14 (although increased) and ER30 did not differ from those exposed to social housing. These data suggest that the poststroke brain displays heightened sensitivity to rehabilitative experience early after the stroke but declines with time. These findings have important implications for rehabilitation of stroke patients, many of whom experience considerable delays before therapy is initiated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex
Trachtenberg, J. T., Chen, B. E., Knott, G. W., Feng, G., Sanes, J. R., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01273 · Cited by 1,927
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Papadopoulos, C. M., Tsai, S., Alsbiei, T., O'Brien, T. E., Schwab, M. E., & Kartje, G. L. (2002) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10144 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour
Murphy, T. H., & Corbett, D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2735 · Cited by 1,938
Self-citationRepairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery
Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21393 · Cited by 875
Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation
Stinear, C. M., Lang, C. E., Zeiler, S., & Byblow, W. D. (2020) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30415-6 · Cited by 792
Getting Neurorehabilitation Right: What Can Be Learned From Animal Models?
Krakauer, J. W., Carmichael, S. T., Corbett, D., & Wittenberg, G. F. (2012) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968312440745 · Cited by 591
Self-citationEarly Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review
Coleman, E. R., Moudgal, R., Lang, K., Hyacinth, H. I., Awosika, O. O., Kissela, B. M., & Feng, W. (2017) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6 · Cited by 424
Metadata
- Authors
- Biernaskie, J., Chernenko, G., & Corbett, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-02-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1245-1254
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2075808979
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Rehabilitative Experience Declines with Time after Focal Ischemic Brain Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3834-03.2004
- The paper
- Biernaskie, J., Chernenko, G., & Corbett, D. (2004). Efficacy of Rehabilitative Experience Declines with Time after Focal Ischemic Brain Injury. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3834-03.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.