Cited by 249Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryNerve injury and regenerationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Functional recovery and neuroanatomical plasticity following middle cerebral artery occlusion and IN-1 antibody treatment in the adult rat

Papadopoulos, Catherine M., Tsai, Shih‐Yen, Alsbiei, Talal, O'Brien, Timothy E., Schwab, Martin E., Kartje, Gwendolyn L.·2002·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Stroke is a prevalent and devastating disorder, and no treatment is currently available to restore lost neuronal function after stroke occurs. One unique therapy that may improve functional recovery after stroke is blockade of the neurite inhibitory protein Nogo‐A with the monoclonal antibody IN‐1, through enhancement of neuroanatomical plasticity from uninjured areas of the central nervous system. In the present study, we combined IN‐1 treatment with an ischemic lesion (permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion) to determine the effect of Nogo‐A neutralization on cortical plasticity and functional recovery. We report here that, following ischemic stroke and treatment with IN‐1, adult rats demonstrated functional recovery on a forelimb‐reaching task and new cortico‐efferent projections from the opposite, unlesioned hemisphere. These results support the efficacy of Nogo‐A blockade as a treatment for ischemic stroke and implicate plasticity from the unlesioned hemisphere as a mechanism for recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10144

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, C. M., Tsai, S., Alsbiei, T., O'Brien, T. E., Schwab, M. E., & Kartje, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Medical Center (US)
  • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Kartje, Gwendolyn L.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02-19
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
433-441
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2052886216
Cited by
249
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
19.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
ischemic stroke, Nogo-A, middle cerebral artery occlusion, functional recovery, cortical plasticity, forelimb reaching, axon regeneration
MeSH terms
Nogo Proteins, Age Factors, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Feeding Behavior, Male, Myelin Proteins, Neuronal Plasticity, Somatosensory Cortex, Recovery of Function, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Rats, Long-Evans, Stroke, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review