Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TASK Channels Determine pH Sensitivity in Select Respiratory Neurons But Do Not Contribute to Central Respiratory Chemosensitivity

Open access
Mulkey, Daniel K., Talley, Edmund M., Stornetta, Ruth L., Siegel, Audra R., West, Gavin H., Chen, Xiangdong, Sen, Neil, Mistry, Akshitkumar M., Guyenet, Patrice G., Bayliss, Douglas A.·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Central respiratory chemoreception is the mechanism by which the CNS maintains physiologically appropriate pH and PCO 2 via control of breathing. A prominent hypothesis holds that neural substrates for this process are distributed widely in the respiratory network, especially because many neurons that make up this network are chemosensitive in vitro. We and others have proposed that TASK channels (TASK-1, K 2P 3.1 and/or TASK-3, K 2P 9.1) may serve as molecular sensors for central chemoreception because they are highly expressed in multiple neuronal populations in the respiratory pathway and contribute to their pH sensitivity in vitro. To test this hypothesis, we examined the chemosensitivity of two prime candidate chemoreceptor neurons in vitro and tested ventilatory responses to CO 2 using TASK channel knock-out mice. The pH sensitivity of serotonergic raphe neurons was abolished in TASK channel knock-outs. In contrast, pH sensitivity of neurons in the mouse retrotrapezoid nucleus (RTN) was fully maintained in a TASK null background, and pharmacological evidence indicated that a K+channel with properties distinct from TASK channels contributes to the pH sensitivity of rat RTN neurons. Furthermore, the ventilatory response to CO 2 was completely retained in single or double TASK knock-out mice. These data rule out a strict requirement for TASK channels or raphe neurons in central respiratory chemosensation. Furthermore, they indicate that a non-TASK K+current contributes to chemosensitivity of RTN neurons, which are profoundly pH-sensitive and capable of driving respiratory output in response to local pH changes in vivo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4254-07.2007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Mulkey, D. K., Talley, E. M., Stornetta, R. L., Siegel, A. R., West, G. H., Chen, X., Sen, N., Mistry, A. M., Guyenet, P. G., & Bayliss, D. A.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-12-19
Volume
27
Issue
51
Pages
14049-14058
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2012880123
Cited by
183
References
3
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TASK Channels Determine pH Sensitivity in Select Respiratory Neurons But Do Not Contribute to Central Respiratory Chemosensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4254-07.2007
The paper
Mulkey, D. K., Talley, E. M., Stornetta, R. L., Siegel, A. R., West, G. H., Chen, X., Sen, N., Mistry, A. M., Guyenet, P. G., & Bayliss, D. A. (2007). TASK Channels Determine pH Sensitivity in Select Respiratory Neurons But Do Not Contribute to Central Respiratory Chemosensitivity. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4254-07.2007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.