The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Do Axons Differ in Caliber?
Open accessAbstract
CNS axons differ in diameter (d) by nearly 100-fold (∼0.1–10 μm); therefore, they differ in cross-sectional area (d2) and volume by nearly 10,000-fold. If, as found for optic nerve, mitochondrial volume fraction is constant with axon diameter, energy capacity would rise with axon volume, also as d2. We asked, given constraints on space and energy, what functional requirements set an axon's diameter? Surveying 16 fiber groups spanning nearly the full range of diameters in five species (guinea pig, rat, monkey, locust, octopus), we found the following: (1) thin axons are most numerous; (2) mean firing frequencies, estimated for nine of the identified axon classes, are low for thin fibers and high for thick ones, ranging from ∼1 to >100 Hz; (3) a tract's distribution of fiber diameters, whether narrow or broad, and whether symmetric or skewed, reflects heterogeneity of information rates conveyed by its individual fibers; and (4) mitochondrial volume/axon length rises ≥d2. To explain the pressure toward thin diameters, we note an established law of diminishing returns: an axon, to double its information rate, must more than double its firing rate. Since diameter is apparently linear with firing rate, doubling information rate would more than quadruple an axon's volume and energy use. Thicker axons may be needed to encode features that cannot be efficiently decoded if their information is spread over several low-rate channels. Thus, information rate may be the main variable that sets axon caliber, with axons constrained to deliver information at the lowest acceptable rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
(1982) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(82)90076-5 · Cited by 9,089
An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain
Attwell, D., & Laughlin, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001 · Cited by 3,543
Cerebellar Cortex: Cytology and Organization
Palay, S. L., & Chan‐Palay, V. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,679
(1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,512
Palay, S. L., & Chan-Palay, V. (1974) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-65581-4 · Cited by 1,506
Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
Niven, J. E., & Laughlin, S. B. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.017574 · Cited by 1,056
Self-citationVestibular System: The Many Facets of a Multimodal Sense
Angelaki, D. E., & Cullen, K. E. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125555 · Cited by 960
RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE DESIGN OF SKELETAL MUSCLES
Henneman, E., & Olson, C. B. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.581 · Cited by 763
Efficient coding of natural sounds
Lewicki, M. S. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn831 · Cited by 674
Cited by
Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis.
Raffelt, D. A., Tournier, J.-D., Smith, R. E., Vaughan, D. N., Jackson, G., Ridgway, G. R., & Connelly, A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029 · Cited by 620
“Voxel-based analysis (VBA) of diffusion MRI is a common method for studying white matter, providing evidence of altered brain connectivity by detecting differences at a local level (Buchsbaum et al., 1998).”
Oligodendroglial NMDA receptors regulate glucose import and axonal energy metabolism
Saab, A. S., Tzvetavona, I. D., Trevisiol, A., Baltan, S., Dibaj, P., Kusch, K., Möbius, W., Goetze, B., Jahn, H. M., Huang, W., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.016 · Cited by 590
“126 Neuron 91, 119–132, July 6, 2016 The majority of myelinated axons in cortico-spinal tracts fire at a high frequency and comprise a high energy demanding white matter tract (Perge et al., 2012).”
InfluentialSterling, P., & Laughlin, S. (2015) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262028707.001.0001 · Cited by 482
Self-citationLiewald, D., Miller, R., Logothetis, N., Wagner, H.-J., & Schüz, A. (2014) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-014-0626-2 · Cited by 322
Critical pathogenic events underlying progression of neurodegeneration in glaucoma
Calkins, D. J. (2012) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.07.001 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Perge, J. A., Niven, J. E., Mugnaini, E., Balasubramanian, V., & Sterling, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-01-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 626-638
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2079111057
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Do Axons Differ in Caliber? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4254-11.2012
- The paper
- Perge, J. A., Niven, J. E., Mugnaini, E., Balasubramanian, V., & Sterling, P. (2012). Why Do Axons Differ in Caliber? The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4254-11.2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.