Cited by 179Multisensory perception and integrationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 56 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Insula Mediates Access to Awareness of Visual Stimuli Presented Synchronously to the Heartbeat

Open access
Salomon, Roy, Ronchi, Roberta, Dönz, Jonathan, Bello-Ruiz, Javier, Herbelin, Bruno, Martet, Remi, Faivre, Nathan, Schaller, Karl, Blanke, Olaf·2016·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The processing of interoceptive signals in the insular cortex is thought to underlie self-awareness. However, the influence of interoception on visual awareness and the role of the insular cortex in this process remain unclear. Here, we show in a series of experiments that the relative timing of visual stimuli with respect to the heartbeat modulates visual awareness. We used two masking techniques and show that conscious access for visual stimuli synchronous to participants' heartbeat is suppressed compared with the same stimuli presented asynchronously to their heartbeat. Two independent brain imaging experiments using high-resolution fMRI revealed that the insular cortex was sensitive to both visible and invisible cardio–visual stimulation, showing reduced activation for visual stimuli presented synchronously to the heartbeat. Our results show that interoceptive insular processing affects visual awareness, demonstrating the role of the insula in integrating interoceptive and exteroceptive signals and in the processing of conscious signals beyond self-awareness. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT There is growing evidence that interoceptive signals conveying information regarding the internal state of the body influence perception and self-awareness. The insular cortex, which receives sensory inputs from both interoceptive and exteroceptive sources, is thought to integrate these multimodal signals. This study shows that cardiac interoceptive signals modulate awareness for visual stimuli such that visual stimuli occurring at the cardiac frequency take longer to access visual awareness and are more difficult to discriminate. Two fMRI experiments show that the insular region is sensitive to this cardio–visual synchrony even when the visual stimuli are rendered invisible through interocular masking. The results indicate a perceptual and neural suppression for visual events coinciding with cardiac interoceptive signals.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Visual stimuli presented synchronously with the heartbeat had reduced access to visual awareness and lower discrimination accuracy than asynchronous stimuli. High-resolution fMRI showed reduced anterior insula activation for synchronous cardio-visual stimuli, even when rendered invisible by continuous flash suppression.

Key findings

  • In continuous flash suppression, synchronous cardio-visual stimuli took longer to break suppression than asynchronous stimuli: Experiment 1, 3.6 s (SD 1.2) vs 3.4 s (SD 1.05), t(29)=2, p=0.02, Cohen’s d′=0.38; Experiment 2 replicated this, t(14)=3.5, p=0.008, d′=0.65.
  • In visual crowding, accuracy was lower for synchronous stimuli at the smallest center-to-center distance: 56.1 vs 69.4, t(14)=3.93, p=0.0007, d′=1.1; no reaction-time effect was found.
  • Participants were at chance when explicitly judging cardio-visual synchrony: 52.8% ±13.1, t(22)=1.03, n.s., BF=0.22; this accuracy did not correlate with the suppression effect, r=−0.14, p=0.52.
  • fMRI showed weaker anterior insula activation for synchronous than asynchronous stimuli, both when visible, F(1,6)=17.7, p=0.005, and when invisible under CFS, F(1,7)=9.3, p=0.018; control regions ACC, rSTG, and occipital cortex showed no such difference.

Methods

  • Nine experiments: seven psychophysical experiments using CFS, heartbeat awareness, CFS control, visual control, phase-shifted CFS, and visual crowding; 153 right-handed healthy volunteers were recruited and 143 were included in final psychophysical analyses.
  • CFS presented dynamic Mondrian masks to the dominant eye and a yellow octagon target to the other eye; synchronous targets were timed to the QRS complex, while asynchronous targets were at 80% or 120% of the participant’s heartbeat. Crowding used a three-alternative forced-choice letter discrimination task with peripheral flankers.
  • Two high-resolution 7T fMRI experiments used a BVP sensor and event-related design; a heartbeat awareness task localized anterior insula ROIs, and GLM/ROI analyses compared synchronous vs asynchronous conditions, with RETROICOR used to regress out cardiac signal.

Limitations

  • Stated: the authors cannot rule out other interpretations, including anterior insula roles in temporal processing, temporal synchrony, agency, and error monitoring; predictive coding was not directly tested and requires manipulation of prior expectations.
  • Stated: respiration signals were not available and were not regressed from the fMRI data; breaking CFS as a measure of conscious access has been criticized, though the study supplemented it with visual crowding, Bayesian statistics, and full-suppression fMRI.
  • Evident: the fMRI samples were small (8 and 9 participants, with one excluded from each due to motion artifacts >2 mm) and data were analyzed separately in native space rather than transformed to a standardized space, limiting generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4262-15.2016

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 56 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 55 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
34 of 34
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The heartbeat is a lifelong and critical signal for the organism that must be monitored continuously and kept within tight limits to avoid arrhythmia or asystolia, and this monitoring normally occurs outside awareness because one does not experience control over one's heart.

    “The heartbeat is a lifelong and critical signal for the organism, which must be monitored continuously and kept within tight limits to avoid, for example, arrhythmia or asystolia; such monitoring, in most instances, occurs outside of awareness because one does not experience control over one's heart.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The frequency of cardiac-related effects is identical across all afferent inputs.

    “In contrast, the frequency of cardiac-related effects is identical across all afferent inputs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sensory consequences of the heartbeat differ in their temporal delay as a function of the distance from the heart.

    “Although the heartbeat is a periodic signal, its sensory consequences differ in their temporal delay as a function of the distance from the heart.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Experiment 9 trial epochs total 22 seconds, not 24

    Minor

    The stated fixation, stimulus, two response, and rest epochs add to 22 seconds. The trial duration is reported as 24 seconds, leaving 2 seconds unaccounted for.

    Reported 24 · recomputed 22

  • Returning participants are counted as new volunteers

    Minor

    The seven experiment counts sum to 153 participations, but the 23 participants in Experiment 3 had already participated in Experiment 1. The counts therefore describe 130 distinct volunteers, not 153.

    Reported 153 · recomputed 130

  • Experiment 9 voxel width conflicts with matrix and field of view

    Minor

    A 210 mm field of view divided into 160 matrix elements gives an in-plane voxel width of 1.3125 mm, not the reported 1.8 mm.

    Reported 1.8 · recomputed 1.3125

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Knapp, 1998, Mechanoreceptors responsible for transducing heartbeat sensations, Psychophysiology, 35, S51

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–179 of 179

Metadata

Authors
Salomon, R., Ronchi, R., Dönz, J., Bello-Ruiz, J., Herbelin, B., Martet, R., Faivre, N., Schaller, K., & Blanke, O.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2016-05-04
Volume
36
Issue
18
Pages
5115-5127
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2347134072
Cited by
178
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10
FWCI
29.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Fondation Bertarelli
  • European Commission
  • European Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (125759)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
insula, interoception, visual awareness, interoceptive awareness, conscious access, heart rate, self-awareness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Awareness, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Heart, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Perceptual Masking, Photic Stimulation, Visual Perception, Young Adult, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review