Cited by 145Lipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCellular transport and secretion

Control of the postsynaptic membrane viscosity

Open access
Renner, Marianne, Choquet, Daniel, Triller, Antoine·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The physical properties of the postsynaptic membrane (PSM), including its viscosity, determine its capacity to regulate the net flux of synaptic membrane proteins such as neurotransmitter receptors. To address these properties, we studied the lateral diffusion of glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored green fluorescent protein and cholera toxin bound to the external leaflet of the plasma membrane. Relative to extrasynaptic regions, their mobility was reduced at synapses and even more at inhibitory than at excitatory ones. This indicates a higher density of obstacles and/or higher membrane viscosity at inhibitory contacts. Actin depolymerization reduced the confinement and accelerated a population of fast, mobile molecules. The compaction of obstacles thus depends on actin cytoskeleton integrity. Cholesterol depletion increased the mobility of the slow diffusing molecules, allowing them to diffuse more rapidly through the crowded PSM. Thus, the PSM has lipid-raft properties, and the density of obstacles to diffusion depends on filamentous actin. Therefore, lipid composition and actin-dependent protein compaction regulate viscosity of the PSM and, consequently, the molecular flow in and out of synapses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4445-08.2009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crowding in the spine head may contribute to diffusional trapping of receptors.

    “Based on results from modeling (Renner et al., 2009) it has been suggested that crowding in the spine head may contribute to this phenomenon (Colgan and Yasuda, 2014).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Renner et al., 2009

    The Discussion says that obstacles at postsynaptic membranes increase apparent viscosity and favor receptor trapping. In “Diffusion of QD-ChTx depends on cytoskeleton integrity,” the authors describe the postsynaptic membrane as probably crowded and say crowding restricts diffusion. The copy does not establish crowding throughout the spine head or present this as a result of modeling; the reported measurements primarily track lipid-bound probes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kenworthy AK, Nichols BJ, Remmert CL, Hendrix GM, Kumar M, Zimmer- berg J, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2004) Dynamics of putative raft- associated proteins at the cell surface. J Cell Biol 165:735-746.
  2. Kirsch J, Wolters I, Triller A, Betz H (1993) Gephyrin antisense oligonucle- otides prevent glycine receptor clustering in spinal neurons. Nature 366:745-748.
  3. Renner ML, Cognet L, Lounis B, Triller A, Choquet D (2008b) The excitatory postsynaptic density is a size exclusion diffusion environment. Neurophar- macology. Retrieved July 23, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.022. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renner, M., Choquet, D., & Triller, A.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Triller, Antoine
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-03-04
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
2926-2937
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1971067804
Cited by
145
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
postsynaptic membrane, membrane viscosity, lateral diffusion, lipid rafts, actin cytoskeleton, cholesterol depletion, inhibitory synapses, excitatory synapses, neurotransmitter receptors, cholera toxin
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cholera Toxin, Cholesterol, Kinetics, Phosphatidylinositols, Synaptic Membranes, Transfection, Viscosity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, GABA, Receptors, AMPA, Membrane Microdomains, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review