The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Encoding of Sensory Prediction Errors in the Human Cerebellum
Open accessAbstract
A central tenet of motor neuroscience is that the cerebellum learns from sensory prediction errors. Surprisingly, neuroimaging studies have not revealed definitive signatures of error processing in the cerebellum. Furthermore, neurophysiologic studies suggest an asymmetry, such that the cerebellum may encode errors arising from unexpected sensory events, but not errors reflecting the omission of expected stimuli. We conducted an imaging study to compare the cerebellar response to these two types of errors. Participants made fast out-and-back reaching movements, aiming either for an object that delivered a force pulse if intersected or for a gap between two objects, either of which delivered a force pulse if intersected. Errors (missing the target) could therefore be signaled either through the presence or absence of a force pulse. In an initial analysis, the cerebellar BOLD response was smaller on trials with errors compared with trials without errors. However, we also observed an error-related decrease in heart rate. After correcting for variation in heart rate, increased activation during error trials was observed in the hand area of lobules V and VI. This effect was similar for the two error types. The results provide evidence for the encoding of errors resulting from either the unexpected presence or unexpected absence of sensory stimulation in the human cerebellum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“First, activity in the cerebellum is increased during motor errors (Diedrichsen et al., 2005; Schlerf et al., 2012).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Schlerf et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008820 · Cited by 3,253
A theory of cerebellar function
Albus, J. S. (1971) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4 · Cited by 2,539
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
STOODLEY, C., & SCHMAHMANN, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039 · Cited by 2,183
Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation
Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/2870 · Cited by 1,467
Principles of sensorimotor learning
Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Flanagan, J. R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3112 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationA probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum
Diedrichsen, J., Balsters, J. H., Flavell, J. C., Cussans, E., & Ramnani, N. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.045 · Cited by 1,370
Self-citationHuman cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool
Imamizu, H., Miyauchi, S., Tamada, T., Sasaki, Y., Takino, R., Pütz, B., Yoshioka, T., & Kawato, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35003194 · Cited by 1,000
A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum
Diedrichsen, J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.056 · Cited by 989
Self-citationLearning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives
Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35037588 · Cited by 945
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Krakauer, J. W., Hadjiosif, A. M., Xu, J., Wong, A. L., & Haith, A. M. (2019) · Comprehensive physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c170043 · Cited by 918
Autism as a disorder of prediction
Sinha, P., Kjelgaard, M. M., Gandhi, T. K., Tsourides, K., Cardinaux, A. L., Pantazis, D., Diamond, S. P., & Held, R. M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1416797111 · Cited by 563
Consensus Paper: The Role of the Cerebellum in Perceptual Processes
Baumann, O., Borra, R. J., Bower, J. M., Cullen, K. E., Habas, C., Ivry, R. B., Leggio, M., Mattingley, J. B., Molinari, M., Moulton, E. A., et al. (2015) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-014-0627-7 · Cited by 462
Self-citationTaking aim at the cognitive side of learning in sensorimotor adaptation tasks
McDougle, S. D., Ivry, R. B., & Taylor, J. A. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.002 · Cited by 236
Self-citationThe power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research
Hutchinson, J. B., & Barrett, L. F. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419831992 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlerf, J., Ivry, R. B., & Diedrichsen, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Bangor University (GB)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-04-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4913-4922
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4332713
- OpenAlex
- W2108397224
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0726685)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS074917)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- cerebellum, sensory prediction error, error processing, cerebellar lobule VI, heart rate, BOLD signal, reaching movements, error-related brain activity, motor learning
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebellum, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
