Cited by 72Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Suppression of Oct4 by Germ Cell Nuclear Factor Restricts Pluripotency and Promotes Neural Stem Cell Development in the Early Neural Lineage

Open access
Akamatsu, Wado, DeVeale, Brian, Okano, Hideyuki, Cooney, Austin J, van der Kooy, Derek·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The earliest murine neural stem cells are leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent, primitive neural stem cells, which can be isolated from embryonic stem cells or early embryos. These primitive neural stem cells have the ability to differentiate to non-neural tissues and transition into FGF2-dependent, definitive neural stem cells between embryonic day 7.5 and 8.5 in vivo, accompanied by a decrease in non-neural competency. We found that Oct4 is expressed in LIF-dependent primitive neural stem cells and suppressed in FGF-dependent definitive neural stem cells. In mice lacking germ cell nuclear factor(GCNF), a transcriptional repressor of Oct4, generation of definitive neural stem cells was dramatically suppressed, accompanied by a sustained expression of Oct4 in the early neuroectoderm. Knockdown of Oct4 in GCNF−/−neural stem cells rescued the GCNF−/−phenotype. Overexpession of Oct4 blocked the differentiation of primitive to definitive neural stem cells, but did not induce the dedifferentiation of definitive to primitive neural stem cells. These results suggested that primitive neural stem cells develop into definitive neural stem cells by means of GCNF induced suppression of Oct4. The Oct4 promoter was methylated during the development from primitive neural stem cell to definitive neural stem cell, while these neural stem cells lose their pluripotency through a GCNF dependent mechanism. Thus, the suppression of Oct4 by GCNF is important for the transition from primitive to definitive neural stem cells and restriction of the non-neural competency in the early neural stem cell lineage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4527-08.2009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NR6A1 is a nuclear receptor with a role in neurogenesis.

    “Two of them (L152 and F456) are in a region necessary for the interaction with NR6A140, a nuclear receptor with a role in neurogenesis41.”

    From Distinct selective forces and Neanderthal introgression shaped genetic diversity at genes involved in neurodevelopmental disorders (2017) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Introduction calls GCNF an orphan nuclear receptor, and the Discussion describes its role in the transition from primitive to definitive neural stem cells. Our copy does not identify GCNF as NR6A1, so it cannot establish that the named receptor has that role. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 72

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Seaberg, 2002, The identification and chimeric characterization of primitive and definitive mammalian neural stem cells, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 28, 726

Metadata

Authors
Akamatsu, W., DeVeale, B., Okano, H., Cooney, A. J., & van der Kooy, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-02-18
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
2113-2124
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2043018786
Cited by
72
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
Oct4, GCNF, neural stem cell differentiation, pluripotency, DNA methylation, Oct4 promoter, neuroectoderm, transcriptional repression, dedifferentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, DNA-Binding Proteins, Ectoderm, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nervous System, Down-Regulation, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Cell Lineage, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Mice, Neural Tube, Neurogenesis, Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 6, Group A, Member 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review