The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Variability, Detection Thresholds, and Information Transmission in the Vestibular System
Open accessAbstract
A fundamental issue in neural coding is the role of spike timing variation in information transmission of sensory stimuli. Vestibular afferents are particularly well suited to study this issue because they are classified as either regular or irregular based on resting discharge variability as well as morphology. Here, we compared the responses of each afferent class to sinusoidal and random head rotations using both information theoretic and gain measures. Information theoretic measures demonstrated that regular afferents transmitted, on average, two times more information than irregular afferents, despite having significantly lower gains. Moreover, consistent with information theoretic measures, regular afferents had angular velocity detection thresholds that were 50% lower than those of irregular afferents (∼4 vs 8°/s). Finally, to quantify the information carried by spike times, we added spike-timing jitter to the spike trains of both regular and irregular afferents. Our results showed that this significantly reduced information transmitted by regular afferents whereas it had little effect on irregular afferents. Thus, information is carried in the spike times of regular but not irregular afferents. Using a simple leaky integrate and fire model with a dynamic threshold, we show that differential levels of intrinsic noise can explain differences in the resting discharge, the responses to sensory stimuli, as well as the information carried by action potential timings of each afferent class. Our experimental and modeling results provide new insights as to how neural variability influences the strategy used by two different classes of sensory neurons to encode behaviorally relevant stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates
Connor, C., Hsiao, S., Phillips, Jr., & Johnson, K. (1990) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.10-12-03823.1990 · Cited by 317
Cited by
The vestibular system: multimodal integration and encoding of self-motion for motor control
Cullen, K. E. (2012) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.12.001 · Cited by 630
Self-citationSterling, P., & Laughlin, S. (2015) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262028707.001.0001 · Cited by 482
Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisphere stroke: a causal relationship?
Perennou, D. A., Mazibrada, G., Chauvineau, V., Greenwood, R., Rothwell, J., Gresty, M. A., & Bronstein, A. M. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn170 · Cited by 364
Why Do Axons Differ in Caliber?
Perge, J. A., Niven, J. E., Mugnaini, E., Balasubramanian, V., & Sterling, P. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4254-11.2012 · Cited by 326
Vestibular processing during natural self-motion: implications for perception and action
Cullen, K. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0153-1 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadeghi, S. G., Chacron, M. J., Taylor, M. C., & Cullen, K. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-01-24
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 771-781
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2009950336
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Variability, Detection Thresholds, and Information Transmission in the Vestibular System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.4690-06.2007
- The paper
- Sadeghi, S. G., Chacron, M. J., Taylor, M. C., & Cullen, K. E. (2007). Neural Variability, Detection Thresholds, and Information Transmission in the Vestibular System. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4690-06.2007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.