Cited by 14Museums and Cultural HeritageWeb and Library ServicesMedia and Digital Communication

Wer sind die Besucher des virtuellen Museums und welche Interessen haben sie? (Who are the Visitors of the Virtual Museum and What are they Interested in?)

Open access
Schweibenz, Werner·2008·i-com

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Der Beitrag basiert auf einer Analyse der internationalen Forschungsliteratur und geht folgenden Fragen nach: wie ist das Verhältnis von Museumsbesuch und Internetnutzung in Deutschland, welche Informationsbedürfnisse haben virtuelle Museumsbesucher im Internet und wie verhalten sie sich, wie stehen sie zu hohen technischen Anforderungen von Web-Angeboten? Aus der Literaturanalyse werden Schlussfolgerungen für die Vermittlung und den Einsatz von Wissensmedien für virtuelle Museen im Internet gezogen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1524/icom.2008.0017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Virtual museum experiences often display reproductions or entirely digital artifacts, making subject-object dynamics more complex than in physical museums.

    “However, the dynamics become significantly more complex in the virtual museum [7], where what is displayed often comprises reproductions or entirely digital artifacts.”

    From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 5 (page unavailable) describes digital objects in one virtual-museum example and says contextual information is needed for an online visit to offer an experience comparable to a traditional museum visit. It does not say that subject–object dynamics are significantly more complex, or that virtual displays often consist of reproductions or entirely digital artifacts. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Donovan, K.: The Best of Intentions: Public Ac- cess, the Web and the Evolution of Museum Automation. Museums and the Web 1997. Selected Papers from the First International Conference, Los Angeles, CA, March 16-19, 1997 Pittsburgh, PA: Archives & Museum Informatics, 1997. 127-133.
  2. Dierking, L. D.; Falk, J. H.: Understanding Free- Choice Learning: A Review of the Research and its Application to Museum Web Sites. Museums and the Web 1998. Selected Papers From the Second International Conference held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April 21- 25, 1998 Pittsburgh, PA: Archives & Museum Informatics, 1998 http://www.archimuse. com/mw98/papers/dierking/dierking_paper. html (Letzter Zugriff: 26.02.2008).
  3. Hastings, S. K.; Kravchyna, V.: Informational Value of Museum Web Sites First Monday -Peer- reviewed Journal on the Internet 7 (2) 2002 http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_2/ kravchyna/index.html (Letzter Zugriff: 26.02.2008).
  4. Haynes, J.; Zambonini, D.: Why Are They Doing That!? How Users Interact With Museum Web sites Museums and the Web 2007. Pro- ceedings from the International Conference, San Francisco, CA, April 11-14, 2007.
  5. Streten, K.: Honoured Guests -Towards a Visitor- Centred Web Experience. Museums and the Web 2000. Selected Papers From the Forth International Conference, Minneapolis, April 17-19, 2000 Pittsburgh, PA: Archives & Mu- seum Informatics http://www.archimuse. com/mw2000/papers/streten/streten.html (Letzter Zugriff: 26.02.2008).
  6. Thomas, W. A.; Carey, S.: Actual/Virtual Visits: What Are The Links? Museums and the Web 2005. Proceedings from the International Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, April 13-17, 2005 Toronto: Archives & Mu- seum Informatics http://www.archimuse. com/mw2005/papers/thomas/thomas.html (Letzter Zugriff: 26.02.2008).
  7. Vergo, J.; Karat, C.-M.; Karat, J.; Pinhanez, C.; Arora, R.; Cofino, T.; Riecken, D.; Podlaseck, M.: 'Less Clicking, More Watching': Results From The User-Centered Design Of A Multi- Institutional Web Site For Art And Culture. Museums and the Web 2001. Selected Pa- pers From the Fifth International Conference, Seattle, WA, March 14-17, 2001 Pittsburgh, PA: Archives & Museum Informatics. 23-31. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2001/ - papers/vergo/vergo.html (Letzter Zugriff: 26.02.2008).
  8. Witcomb, A.: Re-imagining the Museum. Beyond the Mausoleum London: Routledge, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schweibenz, W.
Corresponding author
Schweibenz, Werner
Venue
i-com
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
11-17
ISSN
  • 1618-162X (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-6826
OpenAlex
W1973066545
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
i-com (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
virtual museum, museum visitors, internet use, information needs, online behavior, knowledge media, museum mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review