The Middling Sort: Commerce, Gender, and the Family in England, 1680–1780
Abstract
To be one of "the middling sort" in urban England in the late seventeenth or eighteenth century was to live a life tied, one way or another, to the world of commerce. In a lively study that combines narrative and alternately poignant and hilarious anecdotes with convincing analysis, Margaret R. Hunt offers a view of middling society during the hundred years that separated the Glorious Revolution from the factory age. Thanks to her exploration of many family papers and court records, Hunt is able to examine what people thought, felt, and valued. She finds that early capitalism and early modern family life were far more insecure than their "classical" models supposed. Commercial needs and social needs coincided to a large extent. The family is central to Hunt's story, and she shows how financial struggles brought conflict, ambiguity, and tension to the home. She investigates the way gender intertwined with class and family hierarchy and the way many businesses survived as precarious successes, secured through the sacrifices made by female as well as male family members. The Middling Sort offers a dynamic portrait of a society struggling to minimize the considerable social and psychic dislocation that accompanied England's launch of a full-scale market economy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marriage was the main way of transferring property, occupational status, personal contacts, money, tools, livestock and women across generations and family groups for centuries.
“as historian Margaret Hunt has shown, it was not just a way, but indeed the main way of transferring “property, occupational status, personal contacts, money, tools, livestock and women” across generations and family groups for centuries (Hunt 1996, p. 151).”
From Natural Selection, Childrearing, and the Ethics of Marriage (and Divorce): Building a Case for the Neuroenhancement of Human Relationships (2012) · cites this paper as Hunt 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The world historical transformation of marriage
Coontz, S. (2004) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00067.x · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Earp, B. D., Sandberg, A., & Savulescu, J. (2012) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-012-0081-8 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hunt, M. R.
- Corresponding author
- Hunt, Margaret R.
- ORCID
- Hunt, Margaret R.
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1996-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4233151586
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of California Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Emotions Research
- Keywords
- middling sort, middle class, early capitalism, family life, gender and class, family hierarchy, commercial life, market economy, social mobility, financial insecurity, 18th century, early seventeenth century, Glorious Revolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review