Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity

Alexander, Jeffrey C., Eyerman, Ron, Giesen, Bernard, Smelser, Neil J., Sztompka, Piotr·2004

Abstract

In this collaboratively authored work, five distinguished sociologists develop an ambitious theoretical model of "cultural trauma"—and on this basis build a new understanding of how social groups interact with emotion to create new and binding understandings of social responsibility. Looking at the "meaning making process" as an open-ended social dialogue in which strikingly different social narratives vie for influence, they outline a strongly constructivist approach to trauma and apply this theoretical model in a series of extensive case studies, including the Nazi Holocaust, slavery in the United States, and September 11, 2001.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/9780520936768

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sound democracy can only be built over the continuous revisiting and debating of the past, and trauma can only be healed by constructing collective, shared narratives about that trauma, never by imposing oblivion.

    “it is widely believed now that a sound democracy can only be built over the continuous revisiting and debating of the past and that it is only possible to heal trauma by constructing collective, shared narratives about that trauma, never by imposing oblivion (Alexander et al., 2004).”

    From Making things public: Archaeologies of the Spanish Civil War (2007) · cites this paper as Alexander et al., 2004

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J., & Sztompka, P.
Published
2004-03-22
Cited by
266
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review