Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,448

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sequencing in Conversational Openings1

SCHEGLOFF, EMANUEL A.·1968·American Anthropologist
DOI 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An attempt is made to ascertain rules for the sequencing of a limited part of natural conversation and to determine some properties and empirical consequences of the operation of those rules. Two formulations of conversational openings are suggested and the properties “nonterminality” and “conditional relevance” are developed to explicate the operation of one of them and to suggest some of its interactional consequences. Some discussion is offered of the fit between the sequencing structure and the tasks of conversational openings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Ausubel Nathan, 1948, A treasury of Jewish folklore
  2. Bales R. F., 1951, Interaction process analysis
  3. 10.2307/2088276 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bergler E., 1938, On the resistance situation: the patient is silent, Psychoanalytic Review, 25, 170
  5. Bolinger Dwight, 1958, Interrogative structures of American English
  6. Durkheim Emile, 1950, The rules of sociological method
  7. Garfinkel Harold, 1967, Studies in ethnomethodology
  8. Goffman Erving1953Communication conduct in an island community. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Dept. of Sociology University of Chicago.
  9. Goffman Erving, 1965, Behavior in public places
  10. Gumperz John J., 1964, The ethnography of communication, American Anthropologist, 66
  11. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00010 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1037/h0071502 · DOI
  13. Moerman M., Studies in interaction
  14. Oakeshott M., 1959, The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind
  15. Perelman Ch., 1963, The idea of justice and the problem of argument
  16. Priestly J. B., 1926, Talking
  17. Sacks Harvey, Studies in interaction
  18. Schegloff Emanuel A.1967The first five seconds: the order of conversational openings. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Sociology University of California Berkeley.
  19. 10.1177/001872674900200202 · doi:10.1177/001872674900200202
  20. 10.2307/2088227 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/001872676201500305 · doi:10.1177/001872676201500305

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
SCHEGLOFF, E. A.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1968-12
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
1075-1095
ISSN
  • 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1433
DOI
10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
OpenAlex
W2044818951
Cited by
2,448
References
0
FWCI
30.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 14941 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.