Cited by 24Indigenous Studies in Latin AmericaAnthropological Studies and InsightsHistory and Politics in Latin America

Strategies of Adaptive Mobility in the Colombian‐Ecuadorian Littoral1

WHITTEN, NORMAN E.·1969·American Anthropologist

Abstract

A stratification model groups families in a hierarchal arrangement according to a set of variables. Such a model is convenient but is generally not productive in providing explanations of variations in social organization within the lower stratum of a complex socioeconomic system. A model of a successful social mobility sequence supplements a stratification model by allowing investigators to focus on complementary groupings at the local level. In the Pacific lowlands of Colombia and Ecuador, peasants, proletariat, and local middle‐class entrepreneurs are bound by the strategies people adopt in a four‐phase sequence of successful mobility. The sequence, viewed as a developmental cycle, is part of a structure in which peasant organization transforms to proletariat organization and successful proletariat organization evolves into the activities of the local entrepreneurs. The four‐phase sequence itself is part of a larger sociopolitical system manipulated by the local elite who make up a dispersed ambilineal ramage linked to community economics and politics through series of affinal and attenuated affinal bonds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/aa.1969.71.2.02a00030

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Adams Richard N., 1965, Contemporary cultures and societies of Latin America
  2. Evans‐Pritchard E. E., 1940, The Nuer
  3. Goody Jack, 1958, Cambridge papers in social anthropology, 1
  4. Heath Dwight B., 1965, Contemporary cultures and societies of Latin America
  5. Homans George C., 1961, Social behavior
  6. Hunt Robert C., 1965, The developmental cycle of the family business in rural Mexico. American Ethnological Society Proceedings of 1965
  7. Kahl Joseph B., 1965, Social stratification and values in metropoli and provinces: Brazil and Mexico, América Latina, 8, 23
  8. Leeds Anthony, 1965, Contemporary societies and cultures of Latin America
  9. Ossowski Stanislaw1963Different conceptions of social class.Reprinted in Class status and power. R. Bendix and S. M. Lipset.pp.86–96.
  10. Whitten Norman E., 1967, Música y relaciones sociales en las tierras bajas colombianas y ecuatorianas del Pacífico: estudio sobre micro‐evolución sociocultural, América Indígena, 27, 635

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WHITTEN, N. E.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1969-04
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
228-242
ISSN
  • 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1433
OpenAlex
W2062199875
Cited by
24
References
40
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
121.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Demography › History and Politics in Latin America
Keywords
adaptive mobility, social mobility, stratification, peasant organizations, working class, local entrepreneurs, middle class, developmental cycle, local elites, community economy, community politics, Pacific lowlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review