The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urbanization and the Predation Paradox: The Role of Trophic Dynamics in Structuring Vertebrate Communities
Abstract
As the pace and extent of urbanization increase, an understanding of the mechanisms that shape wildlife communities in cities will be essential to their effective management. Predation could be an important determinant of the structure of these communities, but the research to date suggests a predation paradox: Vertebrate predator numbers increase with urbanization, whereas predation rates decline. We reviewed studies on predator abundance and the survival of terrestrial vertebrates in urban and nonurban contexts to evaluate whether the predation paradox is a widespread phenomenon. We conclude that there is substantial support for it. We discuss hypotheses to explain the paradox and suggest that urbanization has fundamentally altered trophic dynamics by reducing top-down control through multiple mechanisms and by increasing bottom-up forcing through the greater availability of anthropogenic foods. The hypotheses are summarized in a conceptual model that generates testable predictions designed to advance our understanding of trophic dynamics in metropolitan areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity
Paine, R. T. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282400 · Cited by 5,361
Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth
Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., Power, M. E., Berger, J., Bond, W. J., Carpenter, S. R., Essington, T. E., Holt, R. D., Jackson, J. B. C., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205106 · Cited by 4,087
Survival and Cause‐Specific Mortality of Red Foxes in Agricultural and Urban Areas of Illinois
GOSSELINK, T. E., VAN DEELEN, T. R., WARNER, R. E., & MANKIN, P. C. (2007) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2006-020 · Cited by 123
Cited by
So overt it's covert: Wildlife coloration in the city
Kreling, S. E. S. (2023) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biad021 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, J. D., Cleeton, S. H., Lyons, T. P., & Miller, J. R.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 809-818
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2136429762
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urbanization and the Predation Paradox: The Role of Trophic Dynamics in Structuring Vertebrate Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6
- The paper
- Fischer, J. D., Cleeton, S. H., Lyons, T. P., & Miller, J. R. (2012). Urbanization and the Predation Paradox: The Role of Trophic Dynamics in Structuring Vertebrate Communities. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.