The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nothing About Us Without UsDisability Oppression and Empowerment
Abstract
This book is a ringing indictment of disability oppression, which, it states, is rooted in degradation, dependency, and powerlessness and is experienced in some form by five hundred million persons throughout the world who have physical, sensory, cognitive, or developmental disabilities. This book provides a theoretical overview of disability oppression that shows its similarities to, and differences from, racism, sexism, and colonialism. The book's analysis is illuminated by interviews conducted over a ten-year period with disability rights activists throughout the Third World, Europe, and the United States. The book finds an antidote for dependency and powerlessness in the resistance to disability oppression that is emerging worldwide. The interviews contain stories of self-reliance and empowerment evoking the new consciousness of disability rights activists. As a latecomer among the world's liberation movements, the disability rights movement will gain visibility and momentum from the elucidation of its history and its political philosophy of self-determination, which is captured in the title of the book. The book expresses the conviction of people with disabilities that they know what is best for them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community
Kenny, L., Hattersley, C., Molins, B., Buckley, C., Povey, C., & Pellicano, E. (2016) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361315588200 · Cited by 1,941
What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research
BARNES, C. (2003) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/713662197 · Cited by 406
Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (2013) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155502 · Cited by 257
Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC
Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.1080/07434610701553684 · Cited by 143
Intersectionality, work, and well-being: The effects of gender and disability.
Brown, R. L., & Moloney, M. E. (2019) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243218800636 · Cited by 110
Disabling incarceration: connecting disability to divergent confinements in the USA
Ben-Moshe, L. (2013) · Critical Sociology · doi:10.1177/0896920511430864 · Cited by 102
Branco, C., Ramos, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (2019) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12340 · Cited by 83
Disability and the Social Importance of Appearance
Lamb, J. M. (2001) · Clothing and Textiles Research Journal · doi:10.1177/0887302x0101900304 · Cited by 76
Sandwick, T., Fine, M., Greene, A. C., Stoudt, B. G., Torre, M. E., & Patel, L. (2018) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085918763513 · Cited by 71
Amann, J., & Rubinelli, S. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7406 · Cited by 34
Neurodivergent Legitimacy in Computing Spaces
Kirdani-Ryan, M., & Ko, A. J. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3690651 · Cited by 15
Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education
Hermann, J., Jansen, N., Richter, U., Fleer, A., & Doganün, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 25th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3769994.3770007 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Charlton, J.
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1998-03-27
- OpenAlex
- W2976773352
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.