Cited by 34Service and Product InnovationMental Health and Patient InvolvementInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study

Open access
Amann, Julia, Rubinelli, Sara·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of online communities to promote end user involvement and co-creation in the product and service innovation process is well documented in the marketing and management literature. Whereas online communities are widely used for health care service provision and peer-to-peer support, only little is known about how they could be integrated into the health care innovation process. OBJECTIVE: The overall objective of this qualitative study was to explore community managers' views on and experiences with knowledge co-creation in online communities for people with disabilities. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative research design was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with nine community managers. To complement the interview data, additional information was retrieved from the communities in the form of structural information (number of registered users, number and names of topic areas covered by the forum) and administrative information (terms and conditions and privacy statements, forum rules). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Our results highlight two main aspects: peer-to-peer knowledge co-creation and types of collaboration with external actors. Although community managers strongly encouraged peer-to-peer knowledge co-creation, our findings indicated that these activities were not common practice in the communities under investigation. In fact, much of what related to co-creation, prototyping, and product development was still perceived to be directed by professionals and experts. Community managers described the role of their respective communities as informing this process rather than a driving force. The role of community members as advisors to researchers, health care professionals, and businesses was discussed in the context of types of collaboration with external actors. According to the community managers, most of the external inquiries related to research projects of students or health care professionals in training, who often joined a community for the sole purpose of recruiting participants for their research. Despite this unilateral form of knowledge co-creation, community managers acknowledged the mere interest of these user groups as beneficial, as long as their interest was not purely financially motivated. Being able to contribute to advancing research, improving products, and informing the planning and design of health care services were described as some of the key motivations to engage with external stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: This paper draws attention to the currently under-investigated role of online communities as platforms for collaboration and co-creation between patients, health care professionals, researchers, and businesses. It describes community managers' views on and experiences with knowledge co-creation and provides recommendations on how these activities can be leveraged to foster knowledge co-creation in health care. Engaging in knowledge co-creation with online health communities may ultimately help to inform the planning and design of products, services, and research activities that better meet the actual needs of those living with a disability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.7406

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]Bagayogo F Lapointe L Ramaprasad J Vedel I Co-creation of Knowledge in Healthcare: A Study of Social Media Usage System Sciences (HICSS) Proceedings 2014 3 10 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 6-9 Jan 2014 Waikoloa, HI, USA IEEE
  2. [38]Locock L Robert G Boaz A Vougioukalou S Shuldham C Fielden J Testing accelerated experience-based co-design: a qualitative study of using a national archive of patient experience narrative interviews to promote rapid patient-centred service improvement HS&DR 2014 2 4 - 25642558 25642558
  3. [65]Conradie P De Couvreur L Saldien J De Marez L Disabled persons as lead users in product innovation: a literature overview Proceedings of NordDesign 2014 Conference 2014 NordDesign 2014 August 27 – 29, 2014 Espoo, Finland / Melbourne, Australia Espoo, Finland Design Society 284 293

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amann, J., & Rubinelli, S.
Affiliations
University of Lucerne (CH)
Corresponding author
Amann, Julia
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
e320
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2761861559
Cited by
34
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
knowledge co-creation, online health communities, people with disabilities, community managers, peer-to-peer knowledge sharing, healthcare innovation, patient involvement, user-generated content, end-user involvement, online forums, participant recruitment, stakeholder collaboration, researchers, patient-provider partnership
MeSH terms
Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Telemedicine, Patient-Centered Care, Community Networks, Education, Distance, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review