Cited by 18Ethics and Social Impacts of AIE-Government and Public ServicesAI and HR Technologies

Algorithmic long-term unemployment risk assessment in use: Counselors’ perceptions and use practices

Open access
Zejnilović, Leid, Lavado, Susana, Martínez de Rituerto de Troya, Íñigo, Sim, Samantha, Bell, Andrew·2020·Global Perspectives

Abstract

The recent surge of interest in algorithmic decision-making among scholars across disciplines is associated with its potential to resolve the challenges common to administrative decision-making in the public sector, such as greater fairness and equal treatment of each individual, among others. However, algorithmic decision-making combined with human judgment may introduce new complexities with unclear consequences. This article offers evidence that contributes to the ongoing discussion about algorithmic decision-making and governance, contextualizing it within a public employment service. In particular, we discuss the use of a decision support system that employs an algorithm to assess individual risk of becoming long-term unemployed and that informs counselors to assign interventions accordingly. We study the human interaction with algorithms in this context using the lenses of human detachment from and attachment to decision-making. Employing a mixed-method research approach, we show the complexity of enacting the potentials of the data-driven decision-making in the context of a public agency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/gp.2020.12908

Cites

0 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 62 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The IEFP ADS is based on demographic data about the individual, including age, unemployment length, and profession, along with other data on macroeconomic trends in Portugal.

    “The system is based on demographic data about the individual, including their age, unemployment length, and profession, along with other data on macroeconomic trends in Portugal.”
  • The IEFP ADS assigns unemployed persons as low, medium, or high risk for remaining unemployed, and job counselors assign them to interventions such as reskilling, resume building, or job search training.

    “The ADS assigns unemployed persons as low, medium, or high risk for remaining unemployed, and then job counselors have the responsibility of assigning them to interventions such as reskilling, resume building, or job search training (Zejnilović et al., 2020).”
  • The Portuguese national employment agency IEFP uses an automated decision system to allocate unemployment resources to at-risk unemployed persons.

    “The Portuguese national employment agency, the Institute for Employment and Vocational Training (IEFP), uses an ADS to allocate unemployment resources to at-risk unemployed persons.”
  • Researchers found that the explanations improved the confidence of the decisions, but counterintuitively, had a somewhat negative effect on the quality of those decisions.

    “Overall, researchers found that the explanations improved the confidence of the decisions, but counterintuitively, had a somewhat negative effect on the quality of those decisions (Zejnilović et al., 2020).”
  • In the IEFP use case, SHAP factors were given to job counselors to show the top factors influencing the score of a candidate both positively and negatively.

    “In the IEFP use case, SHAP factors were given to job counselors to show the top factors influencing the score of a candidate both positively and negatively (Zejnilović et al., 2020).”

Cites

  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Untitled work

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved

Flagged first, then by citations

62 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zejnilović, L., Lavado, S., Martínez de Rituerto de Troya, Í., Sim, S., & Bell, A.
Affiliations
  • NOVA School of Business and Economics (PT)
  • Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
Venue
Global Perspectives
Published
2020
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2575-7350 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037113180
Cited by
18
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Carnegie Mellon University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
algorithmic decision-making, long-term unemployment, risk assessment, decision support system, public employment services, employment counselors, human judgment, human-automation interaction, data-driven decision making, public governance, equal treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review