The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Expert Rhetorics" in Advocacy for Endangered Languages: Who Is Listening, and What Do They Hear?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1499 · Cited by 2,619
Fishman, J. A. (1991) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781800418097 · Cited by 2,232
The economics of linguistic exchanges
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847701600601 · Cited by 2,048
Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: the British in India
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4016 · Cited by 1,657
Kohn, J. J., & Fishman, J. A. (1992) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/330061 · Cited by 1,489
The world's languages in crisis
Krauss, M. (1992) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1992.0075 · Cited by 1,382
Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life
Matthews, J. R. (1996) · Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6696(199607)32:3<241::aid-jhbs6>3.0.co;2-x · Cited by 989
Crystal, D. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139106856 · Cited by 919
The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice
(2001) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004261723 · Cited by 840
Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India
Cohn, B. (2020) · The New Imperial Histories Reader · doi:10.4324/9781003060871-11 · Cited by 805
Cited by
Disinventing and (Re)Constituting Languages
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2005) · Critical Inquiry in Language Studies · doi:10.1207/s15427595cils0203_1 · Cited by 772
Carr, E. S. (2010) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104948 · Cited by 478
The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages
(1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511975981 · Cited by 332
Counting the losses: numbers as the language of language endangerment
Moore, R. E., Pietikäinen, S., & Blommaert, J. (2010) · Sociolinguistic Studies · doi:10.1558/sols.v4i1.1 · Cited by 160
Decolonising Speech and Language Technology
Bird, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.313 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-133
- ISSN
- 1055-1360 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1395
- OpenAlex
- W2114744303
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 31.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Expert Rhetorics" in Advocacy for Endangered Languages: Who Is Listening, and What Do They Hear? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/jlin.2002.12.2.119
- The paper
- Hill, J. H. (2002). "Expert Rhetorics" in Advocacy for Endangered Languages: Who Is Listening, and What Do They Hear? Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2002.12.2.119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
