The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug Use, Drug Possession Arrests, and the Question of Race: Lessons from Seattle
Abstract
Many analysts have argued that the most harmful forms of drug use are disproportionately concentrated in poor communities of color, and that this pattern—combined with law enforcement's tendency to focus on outdoor drug activity—explains racial disparity in drug arrests. Others contend that comparatively high black and Latino drug arrest rates result from racial bias or racist intent on the part of the architects or lieutenants of the drug war. This article offers an alternative explanation of racial disparity in drug arrests in Seattle, Washington. Specifically, we argue that the racialization of imagery surrounding drugs in general and crack cocaine in particular had long-lasting institutional and cultural effects that continue to shape police perceptions and practices, and that these effects explain much of the disparity that characterizes drug possession in Seattle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840
Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration
Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900201 · Cited by 1,499
Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States
Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240206700601 · Cited by 497
How Unregulated Is the U.S. Labor Market? The Penal System as a Labor Market Institution
Western, B., & Beckett, K. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210135 · Cited by 489
Self-citation
Cited by
“Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing
Brayne, S. (2017) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122417725865 · Cited by 596
Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization
Tyler, T. R., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2014) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12055 · Cited by 457
Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing
Brayne, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.001.0001 · Cited by 334
Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts
Brayne, S., & Christin, A. (2021) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa004 · Cited by 279
Teplin, L. A., Welty, L. J., Abram, K. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Washburn, J. J. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2062 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- BECKETT, K., NYROP, K., PFINGST, L., & BOWEN, M.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 419-441
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2068202857
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.