The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Socioeconomic Status Matter? Race, Class, and Residential Segregation
Abstract
Spatial assimilation theory predicts that racial and ethnic residential segregation results at least in part from socioeconomic differences across groups. In contrast, the place stratification perspective emphasizes the role of prejudice and discrimination in shaping residential patterns. This article evaluates these perspectives by examining the role of race and class in explaining the residential segregation of African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians from non-Hispanic whites in all U.S. metropolitan areas over the 1990 to 2000 period. Using the dissimilarity index and various indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), we find that in both 1990 and 2000 high-SES racial and ethnic groups were significantly less segregated from non-Hispanic whites than corresponding low-SES groups, especially among Hispanics and Asians—much as the spatial assimilation model would predict. Consistent with the place stratification model, African Americans of all SES levels continued to be more segregated from whites than were Hispanics and Asians, and this changed little between 1990 and 2000. However, the importance of SES in explaining the segregation of African Americans from whites increased over the period, while not for Hispanics and Asian Americans, providing support for a modest increase in the applicability of the spatial assimilation model for African Americans in the 1990s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cutler, D. M., & Glaeser, E. L. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555361 · Cited by 1,241
Cited by
Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities
Trounstine, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108555722 · Cited by 428
Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes
Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019) · IEA Research for Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1 · Cited by 145
Woods-Giscombé, C. L., & Lobel, M. (2008) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.173 · Cited by 116
Segregation by race and income in the United States 1970–2010
Intrator, J., Tannen, J., & Massey, D. S. (2016) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.003 · Cited by 99
Double Jeopardy: Why Latinos Were Hit Hardest by the US Foreclosure Crisis
Rugh, J. S. (2015) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sou107 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- ICELAND, J., & WILKES, R.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248-273
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2148132360
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Socioeconomic Status Matter? Race, Class, and Residential Segregation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/sp.2006.53.2.248
- The paper
- ICELAND, J., & WILKES, R. (2006). Does Socioeconomic Status Matter? Race, Class, and Residential Segregation. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.2.248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.