Cited by 1,241Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Are ghettos good or bad?

Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L.·1997·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

Spatial separation of racial and ethnic groups may theoretically have positive or negative effects on the economic performance of those groups. We examine the effects of segregation on outcomes for blacks in schooling, employment, and single parenthood. We find that blacks in more segregated areas have significantly worse outcomes than blacks in less segregated areas. We control for the endogeneity of location choice using instruments based on political factors, topographical features, and residence before adulthood. A one standard deviation decrease in segregation would eliminate one-third of the black-white differences in most of our outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355397555361

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ending racial residential segregation would completely eliminate racial differences, among young adults, in income, education, and unemployment and reduce gaps in single motherhood by two-thirds.

    “ending racial residential segregation would completely eliminate racial differences, among young adults, in income, education, and unemployment and reduce gaps in single motherhood by two-thirds [36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cutler, D. M., & Glaeser, E. L.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
827-872
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2157800636
Cited by
1,241
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 78
FWCI
73.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
racial segregation, ghettos, black-white segregation, educational attainment, employment, single parenthood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review