Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular profiling of single circulating tumor cells with diagnostic intention

Open access
Polzer, Bernhard, Medoro, Gianni, Pasch, Sophie, Fontana, Francesca, Zorzino, Laura, Pestka, Aurelia, Andergassen, Ulrich, Meier‐Stiegen, Franziska, Czyz, Zbigniew T, Alberter, Barbara, Treitschke, Steffi, Schamberger, Thomas, Sergio, Maximilian, Bregola, Giulia, Doffini, Anna, Gianni, Stefano, Calanca, Alex, Signorini, Giulio, Bolognesi, Chiara, Hartmann, Arndt, Fasching, Peter A, Sandri, Maria T, Rack, Brigitte, Fehm, Tanja, Giorgini, Giuseppe, Manaresi, Nicolò, Klein, Christoph A·2014·EMBO Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Several hundred clinical trials currently explore the role of circulating tumor cell ( CTC ) analysis for therapy decisions, but assays are lacking for comprehensive molecular characterization of CTC s with diagnostic precision. We therefore combined a workflow for enrichment and isolation of pure CTCs with a non‐random whole genome amplification method for single cells and applied it to 510 single CTC s and 189 leukocytes of 66 CTC ‐positive breast cancer patients. We defined a genome integrity index ( GII ) to identify single cells suited for molecular characterization by different molecular assays, such as diagnostic profiling of point mutations, gene amplifications and whole genomes of single cells. The reliability of > 90% for successful molecular analysis of high‐quality clinical samples selected by the GII enabled assessing the molecular heterogeneity of single CTC s of metastatic breast cancer patients. We readily identified genomic disparity of potentially high relevance between primary tumors and CTC s. Microheterogeneity analysis among individual CTC s uncovered pre‐existing cells resistant to ERBB 2 ‐targeted therapies suggesting ongoing microevolution at late‐stage disease whose exploration may provide essential information for personalized treatment decisions and shed light into mechanisms of acquired drug resistance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/emmm.201404033

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Polzer, B., Medoro, G., Pasch, S., Fontana, F., Zorzino, L., Pestka, A., Andergassen, U., Meier‐Stiegen, F., Czyz, Z. T., Alberter, B., Treitschke, S., Schamberger, T., Sergio, M., Bregola, G., Doffini, A., Gianni, S., Calanca, A., Signorini, G., Bolognesi, C., Hartmann, A., Fasching, P. A., Sandri, M. T., Rack, B., Fehm, T., Giorgini, G., Manaresi, N., & Klein, C. A.
Venue
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Published
2014-10-30
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
1371-1386
ISSN
  • 1757-4676 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-4684
OpenAlex
W2096817916
Cited by
254
References
4
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular profiling of single circulating tumor cells with diagnostic intention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15252/emmm.201404033
The paper
Polzer, B., Medoro, G., Pasch, S., Fontana, F., Zorzino, L., Pestka, A., Andergassen, U., Meier‐Stiegen, F., Czyz, Z. T., Alberter, B., Treitschke, S., Schamberger, T., Sergio, M., Bregola, G., Doffini, A., Gianni, S., Calanca, A., Signorini, G., Bolognesi, C., . . . Klein, C. A. (2014). Molecular profiling of single circulating tumor cells with diagnostic intention. EMBO Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201404033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.