Cited by 45Health Policy Implementation ScienceArt Therapy and Mental HealthEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The Glasgow ‘Deep End’ Links Worker Study Protocol: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of a Social Prescribing Intervention for Patients with Complex Needs in Areas of High Socioeconomic Deprivation

Open access
Mercer, Stewart W., Fitzpatrick, Bridie, Grant, Lesley, Chng, Nai Rui, O'Donnell, Catherine A., Mackenzie, Mhairi, McConnachie, Alex, Bakhshi, Andisheh +1 more·2017·Journal of Comorbidity

Abstract

Background: ‘Social prescribing’ can be used to link patients with complex needs to local (non-medical) community resources. The ‘Deep End’ Links Worker Programme is being tested in general practices serving deprived populations in Glasgow, Scotland. Objectives: To assess the implementation and impact of the intervention at patient and practice levels. Methods: Study design: Quasi-experimental outcome evaluation with embedded theory-driven process evaluation in 15 practices randomized to receive the intervention or not. Complex intervention: Comprising a practice development fund, a practice-based community links practitioner (CLP), and management support. It aims to link patients to local community organizations and enhance practices’ social prescribing capacity. Study population: For intervention practices, staff and adult patients involved in referral to a CLP, and a sample of community organization staff. For comparison practices, all staff and a random sample of adult patients. Sample size: 286 intervention and 484 comparator patients. Outcomes: Primary patient outcome is health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary patient outcomes include capacity, depression/anxiety, self-esteem, and healthcare utilization. Practice outcome measures include team climate, job satisfaction, morale, and burnout. Outcomes measured at baseline and 9 months. Processes: Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the programme and possible mechanisms through which outcomes are achieved. Analysis plan: For outcome, intention-to-treat analysis with differences between groups tested using mixed-effects regression models. For process, case-study approach with thematic analysis. Discussion: This evaluation will provide new evidence about the implementation and impact of social prescribing by general practices serving patients with complex needs living in areas of high deprivation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15256/joc.2017.7.102

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the 'Deep End' scheme [51] in Glasgow, community links practitioners (CLPs) were embedded in practices and carried out one-to-one working with patients to support patients' use of community services.

    “This was achieved in the ‘Deep End’ scheme [51] in Glasgow where ‘community links practitioners’ (CLPs) were embedded in practices; these CLPs carried out which one-to-one working with patients to support patients’ use of community services.”

    From Can support workers from AgeUK deliver an intervention to support older people with anxiety and depression? A qualitative evaluation (2019) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Introduction describes CLPs attached to Glasgow ‘Deep End’ practices who work with patients on non-medical problems through referrals to local community organizations. The Intervention section also identifies a practice-attached CLP. Neither passage specifies that the patient work was one-to-one. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010 2010 London The Marmot Review Available from: http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review [Last accessed Jan 9, 2017]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mercer, S. W., Fitzpatrick, B., Grant, L., Chng, N. R., O'Donnell, C. A., Mackenzie, M., McConnachie, A., Bakhshi, A., & Wyke, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Corresponding author
Mercer, Stewart W.
Venue
Journal of Comorbidity
Published
2017-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
2235-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2581117119
Cited by
45
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Comorbidity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NHS Health Scotland
  • Scottish Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
social prescribing, complex needs, socioeconomic deprivation, general practice, health-related quality of life, community resources, implementation barriers and facilitators, health care utilization, anxiety and depression, staff burnout, Glasgow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review