The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking and life events that occurred in the distant past.
Abstract
This study investigated the test-retest reliability of 69 alcohol abusers' current reports about their past (approximately 8 years prior to interview) drinking behavior and life events. Drinking behavior was assessed by the Lifetime Drinking History (LDH) questionnaire and life events were assessed using the Recent Life Changes Questionnaire (RLCQ). Reliability coefficients for LDH variables were generally moderate to high (r = .52 to .81). Using empirical criteria, the diagnostic power of the two LDH interviews to classify correctly subjects as either having had or not having had a drinking problem was quite high. The reliability coefficient for the RLCQ was r = .85 and 91.7% of the identified events were reported in both interviews. Similarly high test-retest reliabilities and individual event agreement rates were obtained for the six homogeneous subscales of the RLCQ. Subjects were also asked why they had given inconsistent answers to life events questions in the two interviews. Inconsistencies often resulted from errors in the temporal placement of events or from misunderstanding items, rather than from failure to recall an event; this suggests that some sources of error in recalling life events can be reduced. It is concluded that alcohol abusers' reports of drinking and life events occurring many years prior to the date of interview are generally reliable. This finding is consistent with previous studies showing high test-retest reliabilities for reports of recent drinking and related events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodological aspects of life events research
Paykel, E. S. (1983) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(83)90065-x · Cited by 412
Cited by
Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992) · Measuring Alcohol Consumption · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0357-5_3 · Cited by 4,110
Self-citationResilience as positive coping appraisals: Testing the schematic appraisals model of suicide (SAMS)
Johnson, J., Gooding, P. A., Wood, A. M., & Tarrier, N. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.10.007 · Cited by 347
The motivation for change from problem alcohol and heroin use
KLINGEMANN, H. K. ‐. (1991) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb03099.x · Cited by 223
Gazdzinski, S., Durazzo, T. C., Studholme, C., Song, E., Banys, P., & Meyerhoff, D. J. (2005) · Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research · doi:10.1097/01.alc.0000175018.72488.61 · Cited by 160
Time course of symptom remission in eating disorders
Clausen, L. (2004) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20043 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Riley, D. M., Schuller, R., Pavan, D. S., Cancilla, A., Klajner, F., & Leo, G. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-232
- ISSN
- 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
- 1934-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2077947740
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking and life events that occurred in the distant past. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15288/jsa.1988.49.225
- The paper
- Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Riley, D. M., Schuller, R., Pavan, D. S., Cancilla, A., Klajner, F., & Leo, G. I. (1988). The reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking and life events that occurred in the distant past. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1988.49.225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.