The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of daily self-reported alcohol consumption using interactive voice response (IVR) technology.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the validity of daily self-reported drinking data obtained using an automated touch-tone interactive voice response (IVR) system. METHOD: Subjects (N = 30) reported alcohol consumption daily for 28 days using the IVR system. Concurrently, breath and saliva samples were obtained each night for objective determination of blood alcohol concentrations (BACs). Partners living with the subjects provided collateral reports daily. Retrospective drinking records were obtained from both partners at the outset of the study and from the target subjects at the end of the study, using timeline follow-back procedures referencing the target subjects' drinking over the previous 28-day period. RESULTS: Subjects reported drinking on 55.2% of the 840 possible subject days, and positive BAC readings were obtained on 25.9% of these days. The overall correlation between self-report and measured BAC was .72. Within-subject correlations between daily IVR reports and measured BACs ranged from -.07 to .92, with a mean of .57. The correlations between self-reported drinking and the collateral reports ranged from .18 to 1.0, with a mean of .89. Correlations between the daily self-reports and the timeline follow-back records obtained at the end of the study ranged from -.22 to .96, with a mean of .51. CONCLUSIONS: IVR technology provides an innovative, user-friendly methodology for obtaining valid measures of daily alcohol consumption. The validity of these measures may be differentially highest for frequent, heavy drinkers, a group for whom traditional assessment methods often produce the most biased underestimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Gmel, G., & Rehm, J. (2004) · Contemporary Drug Problems · doi:10.1177/009145090403100304 · Cited by 466
Assessment of Adult Psychopathology: Meta-Analyses and Implications of Cross-Informant Correlations.
Achenbach, T. M., Krukowski, R. A., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.361 · Cited by 406
Fals-Stewart, W. (2003) · Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.71.1.41 · Cited by 375
Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities
Greenfield, T. K., & Kerr, W. C. (2008) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02197.x · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Perrine, M. W., Mundt, J. C., Searles, J. S., & Lester, L. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 487-490
- ISSN
- 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
- 1934-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2049785654
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of daily self-reported alcohol consumption using interactive voice response (IVR) technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15288/jsa.1995.56.487
- The paper
- Perrine, M. W., Mundt, J. C., Searles, J. S., & Lester, L. S. (1995). Validation of daily self-reported alcohol consumption using interactive voice response (IVR) technology. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1995.56.487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.