Cited by 64Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsBehavioral Health and Interventions

The efficacy of a brief alcohol intervention combined with %CDT feedback in patients being treated for type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension

Fleming, Michael, Brown, Randall, Brown, David·2004·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol biomarkers are being developed to improve a physician's ability to identify and intervene with patients with chronic medical problems adversely affected by heavy alcohol use. This article reports the findings of a brief intervention trial which included feedback to patients of their carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) test results. METHOD: A pilot study was conducted to test the efficacy of brief clinician advice to reduce alcohol use and improve health status in a sample of 151 patients being treated for Type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The intervention included informing patients of their CDT levels. The patients were randomized to a usual care or brief intervention group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences at baseline between the two groups in alcohol use, CDT levels, addiction rates, age, gender, socioeconomic status or health status measures. Following brief intervention, significant differences were observed in the intervention group in alcohol use and CDT: The proportion of heavy drinkers at the 12-month follow-up compared with baseline decreased from 35.8% to 24.7% in the intervention group, with no change in the control group (p < .044). CDT levels decreased as well from 2.79% to 2.41% (16% change) in the control group and 3.05% to 2.35% (28% change) in the intervention group, with significantly more intervention-group patients reducing their CDT level by at least 25% (p < .006). CONCLUSIONS: The study provides new information suggesting brief intervention, combined with feedback on CDT levels, can reduce alcohol use and %CDT in a sample of primary care patients being treated for Type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.631

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleming, M., Brown, R., & Brown, D.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
2004-09
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
631-637
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2004465213
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa008512-04)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA08512-03)
  • National Eye Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
brief alcohol intervention, carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, alcohol biomarkers, alcohol consumption reduction, heavy drinking, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, patient feedback, primary care patients, alcohol-related health problems
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Transferrin, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review