Cited by 205Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentHomelessness and Social Issues

Helping other alcoholics in alcoholics anonymous and drinking outcomes: findings from project MATCH.

Open access
Pagano, Maria E, Friend, Karen B, Tonigan, J Scott, Stout, Robert L·2004·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) is the largest mutual-help organization for alcoholics in the world, its specific mechanisms that mobilize and sustain behavior change are poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to examine prospectively the relationship between helping other alcoholics and relapse in the year following treatment for alcohol use disorders. METHOD: Data were derived from Project MATCH, a longitudinal prospective investigation of the efficacy of three behavioral treatments for alcohol abuse and dependence. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to calculate probabilities of time to alcohol relapse. To identify the unique value of helping other alcoholics when controlling for the number of AA meetings attended, proportional hazards regressions were conducted to determine whether the likelihood of relapse was lower for those who were helping other alcoholics. RESULTS: There were no demographic differences that distinguished participants in regard to involvement in helping other alcoholics, with the exception of age; those who were helping other alcoholics were, on average, 3 years older than those who were not helping alcoholics. Those who were helping were significantly less likely to relapse in the year following treatment, independent of the number of AA meetings attended. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide compelling evidence that recovering alcoholics who help other alcoholics maintain long-term sobriety following formal treatment are themselves better able to maintain their own sobriety. Clinicians who treat persons with substance abuse disorders should encourage their clients to help other recovering alcoholics to stay sober.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.766

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Helping others during treatment doubled the chances of staying sober in the initial months following treatment.

    “helping others during treatment doubled the chances of staying sober in the initial months following treatment”

    From Social anxiety and peer helping in adolescent addiction treatment (2015) · cites this paper as Pagano et al., 2004

    The Results report that 40% of participants helping other alcoholics at the end of treatment avoided a drink, compared with 22% of those not helping—approximately twice as many. That comparison covers the 12 months following treatment, not specifically the initial months, so the claimed timeframe is not established. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Alcoholics Anonymous. Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcoholics Anonymous. Alcoholics Anonymous: The Story of How Many Thousands of Men and Women Have Recovered from Alcoholism. 4. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R) Washington, DC: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  4. Babor TF, Steinberg K, Zweben A, Cisler R, Stout R, Tonigan JS, Anton RF, Allen JP. Treatment effects across multiple dimensions of outcome. In: Babor TF, Del Boca FK, editors. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. New York: Cambridge Univ Press; 2003. pp. 150–165. [Google Scholar]
  5. Del Boca FK, Mattson ME, Fuller R, Babor TF. Planning a multisite matching trial: Organizational structure and research design. In: Babor TF, Del Boca FK, editors. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. New York: Cambridge Univ Press; 2003. pp. 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenfield LA. Report prepared for the Assistant Attorney General’s National Symposium on Alcohol Abuse and Crime. Washington, DC: Department of Justice; 1998. Alcohol and Crime: An Analysis of National Data on the Prevalence of Alcohol Involvement in Crime. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kessler CR, Mcleod DJ, Wethington E. The costs of aging: A perspective on the relationship between sex and psychological distress. In: Sarason I, Sarason B, editors. Social Support, Theory, Research, and Applications. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff; 1985. pp. 491–506. [Google Scholar]
  8. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 8, NIH Publication No. 01-4238. Washington: Government Printing Office; 2001. Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and Causal Chain Analysis. [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller WR, Wilbourne PL, Hetterma JE. What works? A summary of alcohol treatment outcome research. In: Hester RK, Miller WR, editors. Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches: Effective Alternatives. 3. Needham Heights, MA: Allen & Bacon; 2003. pp. 13–63. [Google Scholar]
  10. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tonigan JS. Issues in alcohol treatment outcome assessment. In: Allen JP, Columbus M, editors. Assessing Alcohol Problems: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Treatment Handbook Series No 4, NIH Publication No 95-3745. Washington: Government Printing Office; 1995. pp. 143–154. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zemore SE, Kaskutas LA. Traditions of caring: The roles of spirituality, AA, and peer helping in recovery. Poster presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism; Fort Lauderdale, FL. June 2003. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zweben A, Rose SJ, Stout RL, Zywiak WH. Case monitoring and motivational style brief interventions. In: Hester RK, Miller WR, editors. Handbook of Alcoholism: Effective Alternatives. 3. Needham Heights, MA: Allen & Bacon; 2003. pp. 113–130. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pagano, M. E., Friend, K. B., Tonigan, J. S., & Stout, R. L.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
2004-11
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
766-773
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2095924343
Cited by
204
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007459)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
Alcoholics Anonymous, alcohol relapse, alcoholism treatment, self-help groups, long-term sobriety, Project MATCH, recovery support
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholics Anonymous, Alcoholism, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review