Cited by 687Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsMental Health Treatment and Access

Alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students.

Knight, John R, Wechsler, Henry, Kuo, Meichun, Seibring, Mark, Weitzman, Elissa R, Schuckit, Marc A·2002·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students, and to identify characteristics associated with these diagnoses. METHOD: More than 14,000 students at 119 4-year U.S. colleges completed a questionnaire that included items corresponding to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence. Frequencies were computed, and correlations used to identify demographic, drinking and other variables associated with these diagnoses. RESULTS: 31% percent of students endorsed criteria for an alcohol abuse diagnosis and 6% for a dependence diagnosis in the past 12 months. More than two of every five students reported at least one symptom of abuse or dependence. Students who were heavy episodic drinkers were more likely than those who were not to have an alcohol disorder. Students who were frequent heavy episodic drinkers had 13 times greater odds for abuse and 19 times greater odds for dependence. One of every five heavy episodic drinkers was classified with dependence. Few reported seeking treatment since coming to college. Students from heavy drinking college environments were more likely to have abuse and dependence diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Many college students report behaviors and symptoms that meet the diagnostic standard for alcohol abuse or dependence. In addition to strengthening prevention programs, colleges should implement new strategies for screening and early identification of high risk student drinkers and ensure that treatment is readily available for those with alcohol disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.263

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knight et al. (2002) found membership in fraternity/sorority significantly increased the odds of alcohol abuse (OR = 1.9) or dependence (OR = 1.8) diagnoses.

    “Using CAS 1999 data, Knight et al. (2002) found membership in fraternity/sorority significantly increased the odds of alcohol abuse (OR = 1.9) or dependence (OR = 1.8) diagnoses.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knight, J. R., Wechsler, H., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Weitzman, E. R., & Schuckit, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, and Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. john.knight@tch.harvard.edu
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
2002-05
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
263-270
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2121483393
Cited by
687
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
alcohol abuse, alcoholism, university students, prevalence, binge drinking, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, alcohol prevention programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Education, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Students, United States, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review