Cited by 37Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsCrime Patterns and Interventions

School bonding as a moderator of the effect of peer influences on alcohol use among American Indian adolescents

Open access
Dickens, Danielle D., Dieterich, Sara E., Henry, Kimberly L., Beauvais, Fred·2012·Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggests that substance use among American Indian youth is associated with disproportionate rates of morbidity and substance misuse. Additional work to understand risk and protective factors for alcohol use is needed. The current study examined the role of school bonding in buffering the effect of peer alcohol use on a student's own alcohol use among American Indian adolescents. METHOD: The present study is part of a larger examination of alcohol use among American Indian youth. Survey data were collected from middle and high school students during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 school years from 37 school districts in the United States. The sample consisted of 2,582 students ages 11-19 years: 1,606 were younger than 16, and 976 were age 16 or older. All students self-identified as American Indian or Alaskan Native. The sample was approximately equally divided by gender (49% male). RESULTS: For all students, peer alcohol use was a risk factor for (a) lifetime alcohol use and (b) level of alcohol use among users. School bonding was associated with a lower likelihood of lifetime alcohol use for adolescents younger than age 16 and a lower level of use among users for all adolescents. School bonding emerged as a protective factor that buffers against peer alcohol use among adolescent alcohol users younger than 16. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study demonstrate the influence of exposure to alcohol-using peers and the protective role of school bonding on alcohol use among American Indian adolescents. Implications for prevention are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.597

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Faircloth SC, Tippeconnic JW., III . The dropout/graduation crisis among American Indian and Alaska native students: Failure to respond places the future of native peoples at risk. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA; 2010. Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/news/research/k-12-education/ school-dropout s/the-dropout-graduation-crisis-among-american-indian-and-alaska-native-students-failure-to-respond-places-the-future-of-native-peoples-at-risk. [Google Scholar]
  2. Herring RD. Substance use among Native American Indian youth: A selected review of causality. Journal of Counseling & Development. 1994;72:578–584. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hirschi T. Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2007 (NIH Publication No. 08–6418) Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Authors; 1998–2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, Van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology. 2001;27:85–95. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1987. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickens, D. D., Dieterich, S. E., Henry, K. L., & Beauvais, F.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Published
2012-07
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
597-603
ISSN
  • 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4114
OpenAlex
W2123184820
Cited by
37
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA003371, 5R01DA03371-23)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
school connectedness, peer influence, peer alcohol use, adolescent alcohol use, American Indian adolescents, protective factors, moderation, substance use prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Child, Child Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Inuit, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Object Attachment, Peer Group, Risk Factors, Schools, Social Control, Informal, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review