Cited by 66Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The effect of an educational intervention on alcohol consumption, at-risk drinking, and health care utilization in older adults: the Project SHARE study

Open access
Ettner, Susan L, Xu, Haiyong, Duru, O Kenrik, Ang, Alfonso, Tseng, Chi-Hong, Tallen, Louise, Barnes, Andrew, Mirkin, Michelle +2 more·2014·Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a patient-provider educational intervention in reducing at-risk drinking among older adults. METHOD: This was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of 31 primary care providers and their patients ages 60 years and older at a community-based practice with seven clinics. Recruitment occurred from July 2005 to August 2007. Eligibility was determined by telephone and a baseline mailed survey. A total of 1,186 at-risk drinkers were identified by the Comorbidity Alcohol Risk Evaluation Tool. Follow-up patient surveys were administered at 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline. Study physicians and their patients were randomly assigned to usual care (n = 640 patients) versus the Project SHARE (Senior Health and Alcohol Risk Education) intervention (n = 546 patients), which included personalized reports, educational materials, drinking diaries, physician advice during office visits, and telephone counseling delivered by a health educator. Main outcomes were alcohol consumption, at-risk drinking (overall and by type), alcohol discussions with physicians, health care utilization, and screening and intervention costs. RESULTS: At 12 months, the intervention was significantly associated with an increase in alcohol-related discussions with physicians (23% vs. 13%; p ≤ .01) and reductions in at-risk drinking (56% vs. 67%; p ≤ .01), alcohol consumption (-2.19 drinks per week; p ≤ .01), physician visits (-1.14 visits; p = .03), emergency department visits (16% vs. 25%; p ≤ .01), and nonprofessional caregiving visits (12% vs. 17%; p ≤ .01). Average variable costs per patient were $31 for screening and $79 for intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention reduced alcohol consumption and at-risk drinking among older adults. Effects were sustained over a year and may have been associated with lower health care utilization, offsetting screening and intervention costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.447

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Five studies reported the final values of the quantity of alcohol consumed in a specified time period at 12 months but without corresponding standard deviations.

    “Five studies reported the final values of the quantity of alcohol consumed in a specified time period at 12 months but without corresponding standard deviations (Babor 2006;Cherpitel 2009;Ettner 2014;McIntosh 1997;Spirito 2004).”
  • In five studies, there were unexplained differences between losses to follow-up in the intervention and control arms.

    “There were unexplained differences between losses to follow-up in the intervention and control arms in five studies (D'Amico 2008;Drummond 2009;Ettner 2014;Fleming 1997;Moore 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ettner, S. L., Xu, H., Duru, O. K., Ang, A., Tseng, C.-H., Tallen, L., Barnes, A., Mirkin, M., Ransohoff, K., & Moore, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Sansum Medical Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Published
2014-05
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
447-457
ISSN
  • 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4114
OpenAlex
W2022135639
Cited by
66
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1k08ag033630-01a1)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA15957, R01AA013990, R01AA013937, K24AA015957, 1RO1AA013990)
  • National Institute on Aging (5K08AG033630-05, K08-AG033630, P30AG021684)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
hazardous drinking, older adults, alcohol consumption, alcohol screening, physician recommendations, telephone counseling, health care utilization, emergency department visits, cost-effectiveness, primary care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review