Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the literature on alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family interventions and examines the long-term effects of the Iowa Strengthening Families Program (ISFP) on these outcomes. METHOD: A longitudinal, controlled efficacy study of the ISFP was conducted with 446 families from 22 rural school districts in a Midwestern state. Alcohol initiation behaviors were measured by a four-item index (Alcohol Initiation Index [AII]), with low scores representing a lower level of alcohol initiation. The AII was examined using mixed-model analyses of covariance. Relative reduction rates for individual initiation behaviors and initiation differences among higher- and lower-dosage intervention groups were calculated. RESULTS: AII scores were significantly lower among intervention group adolescents than among control group adolescents at 1- and 2-year follow-up assessments. Relative-reduction rate differences between intervention and control groups on specific alcohol initiation behaviors (e.g., onset of drinking without parental permission, onset of drunkenness) ranged from approximately 30% to 60%. Dosage-related initiation differences were evident only at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Studies indicating the public health benefits of universal interventions that delay the initiation of alcohol use also underscore the importance of the current line of investigation. All effect sizes and relative reduction rates of specific alcohol initiation behaviors suggest the practical significance of the findings. The gap in the prevention outcome knowledge base in this area of investigation could be filled with more rigorous universal family-focused intervention studies that address a wide range of implementation and methodological issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SFP 10-14 has demonstrated consistent positive impacts on youth behavior problems, delinquency, and alcohol and drug abuse in clinical trials.
“The program has demonstrated consistent positive impacts on youth behavior problems, delinquency, and alcohol and drug abuse in clinical trials [10–12].”
Youth participants in SFP 10-14 were about half as likely as those who did not receive SFP 10-14 to report ever using alcohol or ever being drunk 2 years following the end of the program.
“For example, Spoth et al. [11] found that youth participants in SFP 10-14 were about half as likely as those who did not receive SFP 10-14 to report ever using alcohol or ever being drunk 2 years following the end of the program.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., Trudeau, L., & Shin, C. (2002) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.16.2.129 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Self-citationSpoth, R., Reyes, M. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1999) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.67.5.619 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationSpoth, R. L., Randall, G. K., Trudeau, L., Shin, C., & Redmond, C. (2008) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.023 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationAdaptations in a Community-Based Family Intervention: Replication of Two Coding Schemes
Cooper, B. R., Shrestha, G., Hyman, L., & Hill, L. (2016) · The Journal of Primary Prevention · doi:10.1007/s10935-015-0413-4 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Strengthening Families Programme
Skarstrand, E., Sundell, K., & Andreasson, S. (2014) · The European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt146 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Cooper, B. R., Hill, L. G., Parker, L., Jenkins, G. J., Shrestha, G., & Funaiole, A. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00303-4 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Lepper, H.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- ORCID
- Spoth, R
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- s13
- Pages
- 103-111
- ISSN
- 0363-468X (ISSN-L)
- 1946-6005
- OpenAlex
- W2086564964
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Internal Security Fund - Police
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH049217, MH 49217-01 A1)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA007029, DA070 29-01A1)
- Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- alcohol initiation, adolescent alcohol use, intervention dosage, rural school districts, drunkenness, parental permission
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Child, Female, Humans, Iowa, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parents, Rural Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review