Cited by 144Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCrime Patterns and Interventions

Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study.

Spoth, R, Redmond, C, Lepper, H·1999·Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the literature on alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family interventions and examines the long-term effects of the Iowa Strengthening Families Program (ISFP) on these outcomes. METHOD: A longitudinal, controlled efficacy study of the ISFP was conducted with 446 families from 22 rural school districts in a Midwestern state. Alcohol initiation behaviors were measured by a four-item index (Alcohol Initiation Index [AII]), with low scores representing a lower level of alcohol initiation. The AII was examined using mixed-model analyses of covariance. Relative reduction rates for individual initiation behaviors and initiation differences among higher- and lower-dosage intervention groups were calculated. RESULTS: AII scores were significantly lower among intervention group adolescents than among control group adolescents at 1- and 2-year follow-up assessments. Relative-reduction rate differences between intervention and control groups on specific alcohol initiation behaviors (e.g., onset of drinking without parental permission, onset of drunkenness) ranged from approximately 30% to 60%. Dosage-related initiation differences were evident only at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Studies indicating the public health benefits of universal interventions that delay the initiation of alcohol use also underscore the importance of the current line of investigation. All effect sizes and relative reduction rates of specific alcohol initiation behaviors suggest the practical significance of the findings. The gap in the prevention outcome knowledge base in this area of investigation could be filled with more rigorous universal family-focused intervention studies that address a wide range of implementation and methodological issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsas.1999.s13.103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Lepper, H.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement
Published
1999-03
Volume
13
Issue
s13
Pages
103-111
ISSN
  • 0363-468X (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6005
OpenAlex
W2086564964
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Internal Security Fund - Police
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH049217, MH 49217-01 A1)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA007029, DA070 29-01A1)
  • Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
alcohol initiation, adolescent alcohol use, intervention dosage, rural school districts, drunkenness, parental permission
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Child, Female, Humans, Iowa, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parents, Rural Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review