Cited by 61Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAdolescent Health and Behaviors

Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Strengthening Families Programme

Open access
Skarstrand, E., Sundell, K., Andreasson, S.·2014·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescents' alcohol consumption is a public health concern in Sweden as well as in many other countries. Underage drinking is associated with increased risks of alcohol-related injuries, risky sexual behaviours and dependence later in life. Different strategies have been used in the effort to prevent this behaviour, and to postpone the onset of alcohol. The Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (SFP 10-14) from the USA has been highlighted as one of the more effective prevention programmes. The aim of the present article was to evaluate the effectiveness of a culturally adapted Swedish version of the SFP 10-14. METHODS: This was a cluster randomized controlled trial including 587 sixth-grade students (age 12) and their parents in 19 elementary schools in Stockholm. Schools were randomly assigned to either control (9 schools, 216 students) or to the family skills training intervention (10 schools, 371 students). The SFP Swedish version consisted of two parts with seven and five sessions, respectively, held separately for youths and parents except two joint family sessions. Measures of students' self-reported episodes of drunkenness, smoking, illicit drug use and other norm-breaking behaviours were collected at baseline (March 2003) and at three subsequent yearly surveys. Data were analysed using multilevel models with an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: No preventive effects were found for smoking, alcohol and illicit drug use and other norm-breaking behaviours, nor did moderators affect the outcome. CONCLUSION: The Swedish version of the SFP 10-14 was not effective in preventing youths' substance use in a Swedish context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckt146

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several US-based interventions targeting youth development, education and crime reduction have struggled to replicate their positive effects in the UK and Europe, due in part to differences in service systems, cultural norms and school environments.

    “Several US-based interventions targeting youth development, education and crime reduction have struggled to replicate their positive effects in the UK and Europe more widely. This is arguably due in part to differences in service systems, cultural norms and school environments, which complicate implementation (e.g., Skärstrand et al., 2014; Baldus et al., 2016; Humayun et al., 2017; Fonagy et al.,”

    From Promoting positive youth development with adolescent boys in UK schools: A theory-driven evaluation of the "Becoming a Man" programme (2026) · cites this paper as Skärstrand et al., 2014

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skarstrand, E., Sundell, K., & Andreasson, S.
Affiliations
National Board of Health and Welfare (SE)
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2013-09-27
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
578-584
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2159664892
Cited by
61
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
Keywords
adolescent alcohol use, underage drinking, family skills training, culturally tailored interventions, substance use prevention, smoking, illicit drug use, parental involvement, school-based intervention, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Smoking, Sweden, Program Evaluation, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review